Tribunal held that up to AY. 1986-87, S.2(42A), Explanation 1(b) read with S. 49(1)(iii)(b) provided that where a capital asset had became a property of assessee on any distribution of assets on dissolution of a firm, before 1st day of April, 1987, period for which asset was held by previous owner would be included for working out period of holding of asset by assessee and after amendment vide Finance Act, 1987, with effect from 1-4-1988 to S. 49(1)(iii)(b), period of holding of an asset by an erstwhile partner of a dissolved firm was not to include period of holding of such asset by firm. Accordingly period to be reckoned from date of distribution to partner. On facts the assessee had taken over assets from the partnership firm on 15-05 2003 and sold the same on 4-07-2004 ie one year two months , the same could not be held to be a long term capital asset and not entitle exemption on investment in certain bonds. ( AY.2005 -06)
Amar Kanayalal Nagpal v. ITO (2018) 171 ITD 518 /( 2019) 174 DTR 403 / 195 TTJ 523(Mum) (Trib.)
S. 49 : Capital gains – Previous owner – Firm – Partner-Period of holding-Dissolution of firm- With effect from 1-4-1988 to section 49(1)(iii)(b), period of holding of an asset by an erstwhile partner of a dissolved firm was not to include period of holding of such asset by firm – Period to be reckoned from date of distribution to partner-Asset held was only for one year and two months – Not entitle exemption in respect of investment in certain bonds.[ S. 29A), 2(31),2(42A),45, 50, 54EC ]