Answers to queries on legal issues

If you have a query relating to any legal issue, you can use the form to ask it. We will request our expert panel to provide an answer as soon as possible. This service is for a limited period. So, please avail of it soon

Whether provisions of section 56(2) (x) are applicable to Rights issue of shares ?
Subject: Whether provisions of section 56(2) (x) are applicable to Rights issue of shares ?
Category: 
Asked by: Sree Lekha
Answered by:
Tags: , ,
Date: May 23, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
Section 56 (2)(x) of the Act is an anti-abuse provision. Since the transaction of issue of right shares is as per the provisions of the Companies Act and Rules framed thereof, it cannot be said that the transaction is without consideration or without any substance. (read more)
Allowability of SAD Refund denied by Custom Authorites
Subject: Allowability of SAD Refund denied by Custom Authorites
Category: 
Asked by: Arun Kumar Arora
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: May 23, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
It may be difficult to answer without knowing the full facts . We presume that the assessee had made a claim for refund of custom duty paid and shown it as receivable in the balance sheet . In case the assessee has shown the custom duty refund as income in the profit and loss account… (read more)
. How many hard copies of appeal need to file by assessee before first appellate authority as per Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017 ?
Subject: . How many hard copies of appeal need to file by assessee before first appellate authority as per Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017 ?
Category: 
Asked by: Keyur P. Sheth
Answered by:
Tags: , ,
Date: May 22, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
A) Rule 108 of the Central goods and Service Tax Rules provides for e-filing of the appeal. It states as under:- (1) An appeal to the Appellate Authority under sub-section (1) of section 107 shall be filed in FORM GST APL-01, along with the relevant documents, either electronically or otherwise as may be notified by… (read more)
When there is change in profit sharing ratio whether provision of section 9B read with S.45(4) and 48 of the Act is attracted ?
Subject: When there is change in profit sharing ratio whether provision of section 9B read with S.45(4) and 48 of the Act is attracted ?
Category: 
Asked by: Moti
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: May 22, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
Addressing your questions; 1. Reconstitution of a partnership firm takes place whenever there is a change in the profit sharing ratio among the partners, admission of a new partner, retirement of a partner and death or insolvency of a partner. Therefore, section 9B of the Act will be attracted upon change in profit sharing ratio. (read more)
CITATION OF CHENNAI ITAT JUDGEMENT IN THE CASE OF M/S S V GLOBAL MILL LTD
Subject: CITATION OF CHENNAI ITAT JUDGEMENT IN THE CASE OF M/S S V GLOBAL MILL LTD
Category: 
Asked by: ANIRUDDHA NARAYANRAO DESHPANDE
Answered by:
Tags: , , ,
Date: May 22, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
The Punjab and Haryana High Court in Mahender Pal Narang v. CBDT [2020] 120 taxmann.com 400 (P & H) (HC) after considering the Supreme Court judgement in Ghanshyam (HUF) [2009] 315 ITR 1 (SC) and also relying on sections 56(2) and 57 of the 1961 Act has held that interest received on compensation received for… (read more)
When the assessment order is passed in the old name of the Company . when the name is changed and informed the Assessing Officer , whether the assessment is valid ?
Subject: When the assessment order is passed in the old name of the Company . when the name is changed and informed the Assessing Officer , whether the assessment is valid ?
Category: 
Asked by: CA AMIT N DESAI
Answered by:
Tags: , ,
Date: May 22, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
It seems only the name of the Company is changed and Permanent Account No remains the change . The mistake is a curable defect under section 292B of the Act. It may be desirable for the assessee to write an letter to the Assessing Officer to change the name in the assessment order by passing… (read more)
CAN ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE UNDER RULE 46A BE ADMITTED BY APPELLATE AUTHORITY WHEN THE ASSESSEE WAS NOT ABLE TO FURNISH THE SAME DURING ASSESSMENT STAGE?
Subject: CAN ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE UNDER RULE 46A BE ADMITTED BY APPELLATE AUTHORITY WHEN THE ASSESSEE WAS NOT ABLE TO FURNISH THE SAME DURING ASSESSMENT STAGE?
Category: 
Asked by: KARAN SHAH
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: May 22, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
The assessee should make an application for admitting additional evidence as per Rule 46A of the Income -tax Rules , 1962 . The assessee should provide detailed reason why the additional evidence could not be filed . It is desirable to file the affidavit in support of application . If evidence produced by assessee is… (read more)
Whether reassessment notice issued by Deputy Commissioner of Income tax is valid ?
Subject: Whether reassessment notice issued by Deputy Commissioner of Income tax is valid ?
Category: 
Asked by: Surender singhal
Answered by:
Tags: , ,
Date: May 20, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
If the Notice has been issed prior to April 01, 2021, the erstwhile law pertaining to reassessment shall apply; If the Notice is after 1-4 -2021 , the new provisions of reassessment shall apply. Memorandum explaining the provision states that the amendments will take effect from Ist April , 2021 ( 2020) 430 ITR 214… (read more)
Whether issue of reassessment notice is valid merely on the ground that property sold was not registered ?
Subject: Whether issue of reassessment notice is valid merely on the ground that property sold was not registered ?
Category: 
Asked by: Srsconfirm@gmail.com
Answered by:
Tags: ,
Date: May 19, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
As per Section 148A the Assessing Officer has to conduct inquiry , if required with the prior approval of specified authority and has to serve the notice . You are right registration is not the deciding factor as long as the capital asset is long term the assessee is eligible for exemption . (read more)
Whether payment to unauthorised occupant for vacating the land is allowable as deduction as cost of improvement ?
Subject: Whether payment to unauthorised occupant for vacating the land is allowable as deduction as cost of improvement ?
Category: 
Asked by: ca vinay v kawdia
Answered by:
Tags: , ,
Date: May 19, 2021
Excerpt of answer:
In CIT v. Eagle Theatres (2012) 205 Taxman 449 (Delhi)(HC) the Court held that the amount paid to tenant for vacating the premises is allowable as deduction while computing the capital gains In CIT v. Mohd. V. Shaffiulla (2012) 210 Taxman 613(Karn.)(HC) the Court held that the payments to remove slum dwellers held to be… (read more)