Allowing the appeal of the assessee the Tribunal held that section 54 (1) are mandatory and substantive in nature , while provision of sub section (4) of section 54F are procedural . Accordingly when sale consideration was not deposited in a bank as per capital gain account scheme however investment in acquisition of house was made with in the time prescribed , denial of exemption was held to be not justified. Followed CIT v. K .Ramachnndra Rao (2015 ) 230 Taxman 334 ( Karn) ( HC) , Vatsala Ashthana v. ITO ( 2019 ) 179 ITD 297 110 ( Delhi) ( Trib) ( ITA No. 114/ Del/ 2020 dt 2-3 -2021 ( AY. 2016 -17 )
A