Held that it was for revenue to bring on record cogent material to prove that prejudice was caused to revenue or there was malice on part of assessee to have included said income in preceding previous year while it ought to have been included in current previous year income, matter was to be remanded back to the Assessing Officer. (AY. 2015-16)
Ashoka Construction Company. v. ACIT (2021) 188 ITD 896 (All.)(Trib.)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Civil construction business-Difference in 26AS and actual receipts-Matter remanded back to the Assessing Officer.