The assessee has challenged imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c). It was noted that the addition/disallowance made by Revenue on account of deduction claimed under section 10A of the Act is not due to any inaccurate particulars furnished by the assessee but on a purely presumptive basis. Thus, the penalty was accordingly deleted. (AY. 2006-07, 2008-09, 2009-10)
Auro Gold Jewellery Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 192 DTR 89 / 204 TTJ 1005 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-disallowance u/s.10A-only on presumption basis-Not due to inaccurate information-Penalty was deleted. [S.10A]