Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


CIT v. Angels Education Trust ( 2021 ) 129 taxmann.com 305 ( Mad ) ( HC)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution-Education- Excess of expenditure over income – Exemption cannot be denied [ S. 2(15), 11 ]

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution-Education- Excess of expenditure over income – Exemption cannot be denied [ S. 2(15), 11 ]

Piramal Enterprises Ltd v. Add. CIT ( 2021 ) The Chamber’s Journal- September – P. 69 ( Bom ) ( HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment – Draft assessment order – Natural justice – Order passed without following the procedures laid down under section 144B of the Act is ab-initio -void [S. 143 (3), Art , 226 ]

Korukonda Chalapathi Rao & Ors v. Korukonda Annapurna Sampath Kumar MANU/SC/0757 /2021 (SC) / , 2021(4)RCR(Civil)433 (SC) (SC)

Registration Act, 1908

S. 17: Documents of which registration is compulsory – Effect of non-registration of documents required to be registered – Deed of Family Settlement – Merely recording of past transaction – Registration not mandatory- It may not require to be stamped.[ S. 49, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Ord. 13, R. 3]

Md. Abul Kalam v. UOI (Gauhati) (HC) www.itatonline.org

Oral hearing is an important ingredient of the justice delivery system-An open court proceeding ensures that the judicial process is subject to public scrutiny- Public scrutiny is crucial to maintaining transparency and accountability-.Transparency in the functioning of democratic institutions is crucial to establish the public‘s faith in them…….. – Successor Judge -Has to give oral hearing before passing the order . [ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 , Order XVIII Rule, (2) ]

Bombay Chamber of Commerce v. ITO ( E ) ( Mum ) ( Trib ) www.itatonline.org

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Charitable purpose – Strive to promote the trade , commerce and manufacturers of India without seeking to make profits for its members is charitable purpose – Denial of exemption is held to be not justified [ S. 2(15 ) ]

K. Ilango v. PCIT (2021) 435 ITR 713/ 323 CTR 800 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 281 : Certain transfers to be void-Property transferred prior to passing of assessment orders-Attachment-Order of PCIT was set aside-Tax Recovery Officer is competent authority to pass appropriate order-Matter remanded to the Tax Recovery Officer. [S. 221(1), Sch. II, R. 11, Art. 226]

Dharampal R. Pandia v. Dy. CIT (2021) 435 ITR 301 / 202 DTR 356 / 321 CTR 341 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Failure to file return-Deemed concealment-Survey-Returns filed after receipt of notice under section 148 of the Act-Explanation 3 is satisfied-Levy of penalty is justified. [S. 133A, 148, 153, 274]

PCIT v. Taneja Developers and Infrastructure Ltd. (2021) 435 ITR 122 / 201 DTR 234 / 320 CTR 775 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-New claim-Change in accounting method-Not a case of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars-Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [S. 132, 145, 153A]

Plaza Diamond Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. CCIT (2021) 435 ITR 595 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 269UD : Purchase by Central Government of immoveable properties-Leasehold rights in property-Central Government in possession of property after expiry of lease-Central Government is Liable to pay Municipal taxes on property. [S. 269UD(1), Art. 285, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, S. 139]

L-Cube Innovative Solutions P. Ltd. v. CIT (2021) 435 ITR 566 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Export of computer software-Omitting to claim exemption in return-Rejection Of Rectification-Revision application was rejected on the ground that delay in filing the revised return-Rejection of revision application was held to be not justified-Directed to allow the claim made u/s. 154 of the Act. [S. 139(5), 143(1), 154, Art.226]