Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Bombardier Transportation Sweden AB v. Dy. CIT(IT) (2021) 90 ITR 405 / 199 DTR 108 / 209 TTJ 804 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Intermediary services-No technology made available-Not fees for technical services-Not taxable in India-Sale of equipment and payments carried outside India-Income attributable to Permanent Establishment is not taxable-DTAA-India-Sweden. [S. 9(1)(i), Art. 12]

Paramount Communications Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 90 ITR 20 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Foreign currency-Convertible bonds-Buy back of foreign currency bonds at discounted price-Foreign currency convertible bond proceeds were utilized for setting up a new manufacturing facility or expansion of manufacturing facility-Discount is capital receipt. [S. 28(i)]

Perfecta Lifestyle v. ITO (2021) 90 ITR 689 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Not shareholder of company which had advanced loan to assessee-Loan cannot be treated as deemed dividend.

Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 440 ITR 492 / 209 DTR 257/ 324 CTR 209 / 286 Taxman 1(SC) Editorial , review petition is dismissed ,ACIT v. Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing and Marketing Corporation Ltd (2023) 291 Taxman 357 (SC) Editorial : Decision of Kerala High Court partly affirmed and partly reversed . ( 2022) 440 ITR 496 (SC)

S. 40 (a)(iib) :Amounts not deductible- Fee- Tax – Gallonge fee , licence fee and shop rental (KIST ) with respect to EL-9 and E.L -I licence granted will fall with in the purview of section and hence disallowable -Surcharge on Sales tax and turnover tax is not fee or charge hence not disallowable – Interpretation of taxing statutes – Same statute using different terms and expressions – Must be taken to refer to distinct and different things . [ S. 37(1)), Kerala Abkari Act, 1077 (M.E.) S. 18 , Kerala Foreign Liquor Rules , 1953 , R. 15A ]

Yudhishthira Kapur v. ACWT (2021)90 ITR 90 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

Wealth tax Act, 1957.

S. 2(ea): Asset – Land under acquisition by Government – Not includible .

D. Jayaraman v. ACWT (2021)90 ITR 81 (SN)(Chennai) (Trib)

Wealth tax Act, 1957.

S. 2(e)(a): Assets – Stock in trade -Entries in books of account not relevant to decide nature of asset –Lands held as stock in trade – Not liable to be assessed as assets liable to be wealth -tax Act . [ S. 17 ]

Ekta Housing Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 89 ITR 56 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Whatsapp messages-Employee and promoter of group-Receipt of cash not proved-Penalty cannot be levied. [S. 269SS]

FCI Asia Pte Ltd. vs. DCIT (2021) 212 TTJ 9 (UO) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income-Assessee intimated Assessing Officer well in advance of inadvertence of including receipt-Assessing Officer did not specify in notice whether notice is issued for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. [S. 143(2)]

Villo Noshir Anklesaria (Mrs.) v. ACIT (2021) 89 ITR 31 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Disclosing full facts-Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 54F]

Virendra Singh Bhadauriya v. PCIT (2021) 211 TTJ 452 / 204 DTR 400 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Revision of orders prejudicial to Revenue-Twin conditions to be satisfied-Assessment order cannot be said to be erroneous in law-Revision was quashed. [S. 54F]