Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Venkatesh K. I. v. ACIT (2020)80 ITR 40 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Excise contractor-Demand drafts taken from certain parties-Not furnishing Permanent Account Number not a reason for making addition. [S. 69A]

Laxmi Yadav (Smt.) v. ITO (2020) 80 ITR 22 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Undisclosed bank accounts-Grocery business-Cross deposits and withdrawals-Combined peak credit of both bank accounts to be taken to work out element of undisclosed investments for undisclosed transactions.

Rohit Kapur v. Add. CIT (2020) 80 ITR 7 (SN) / 191 DTR 11 / (2021) 186 ITD 466 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Business income-Director of company purchased one unit in a Hotel, had given for being run by a managing company, said unit could not be construed to be a business of assessee-loss from hotel unit assessed under head income from other sources and not as business loss. [S. 28 (i), 57]

Bhagwan Keshu Sakhare v. ITO (2020) 80 ITR 10 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 54B : Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-Neither Depositing amount in capital gains account nor using net consideration for purchase of land before prescribed date-Not entitled to exemption. [S. 45]

Mehra Eyetech P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2020) 80 ITR 35 (SN) / 195 DTR 282 / 206 TTJ 769 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Transaction duly considered in Income-Tax returns of payee-No disallowance could be made Advertisement-Franchisee news paper-Liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 194C, 201(1)]

Rajeev Verma v. ACIT (2020) 80 ITR 12 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Business promotion expenses-Not practically possible to furnish complete list of gifts to various customers-Quantum of expenditure vis-a-vis turnover would have to be justified-Restriction of 40 Per Cent. of initial total disallowance is held to be reasonable.

ACIT v. Indiabulls Ventures Ltd. (2020) 80 ITR 5 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employees stock option plan Expenses-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

Subhakaran Sampatlall (HUF) v. ITO (2020) 80 ITR 26 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Paying interest thereon at 12.2 Per Cent. and advancing loans charging interest at 7.25 Per Cent. and 10 Per Cent.-Disallowance is held to be not justified.

SKG Wooden Works Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 80 ITR 28 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Intercorporate deposits agreement with assessee and its subsidiaries-Commercial expediency-Interest deductible.

Foseco India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 80 ITR 29 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 35DDA : Amortisation of expenditure-Voluntary retirement scheme – Expenses incurred prior to insertion of section – Governed by earlier provisions. [S. 37 (1)]