Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Nirjay Securities (P.) Ltd v. ITO [2023] 157 taxmann.com 53 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of hearing-Assessment order passed after providing only three working days to respond to draft order and denying personal hearing is violative of principles of natural justice; matter to be remanded for fresh adjudication. [S. 133(6), 142(1), 144C, Art. 226]

Shri Venkatesh Refineries Ltd. v. DCIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 289 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of hearing-Adjournment request-Portal closed without communication-Where department, without either accepting or rejecting assessee’s timely adjournment request, closed submission portal, thereby preventing it from filing its reply, subsequent assessment order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and was liable to be quashed. [S. 143(2), 144B(1)(xiii), Art. 226]

CS & Sons v. NFAC [2023] 153 taxmann.com 177 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of hearing-Inadequate time to respond to show-cause notice a violation of principles of natural justice-Assessment order set aside and matter remanded.[S. 143(3), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Dhondiram Naryan Limbhore [2023] 153 taxmann.com 539 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, PCIT v. Zahira R. Khatun. (2025) 304 Taxman 514 (SC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Where corresponding sales are accepted, addition is to be limited to estimated gross profit. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. M. Dinshaw and Co. (P) Ltd [2023] 156 taxmann.com 170 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 69A : Unexplained moneys-Accommodation bills-Bogus purchases-Onus of proof-Disallowance of expenditure is unsustainable where assessee discharges onus by furnishing substantial evidence to prove genuineness of transaction-Assessee is not required to produce third-party books of account. [S. 37(1), 132, 158BC, 260A]

PCIT v. Samudra Developers (P.) Ltd [2023] 155 taxmann.com 629 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure –Method of accounting-Project completion method-Sales support and management expenses; Project completion method-Day-to-day business expenditure like staff salaries are revenue in nature; cannot be disallowed proportionately based on percentage of project completion. [S. 145]

Bond Safety Belts (Dissolved) v. DCIT [2023] 156 taxmann.com 222 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : Dy. CIT v. Times Guaranty Ltd. [IT Appeal Nos. 4947 and 4198(Mum) of 2008 dt. (2010) 40 SOT 14 (SB)(Mum)(Trib) is held to be not good law.

S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed depreciation –Short term capital gains-Set-off-Unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to pre-amendment years (prior to AY 2002-03) is eligible for indefinite carry forward and set-off against income under any head, including capital gains, in subsequent assessment years. [S. 32(2), 70, 71, 72]

Bank of Maharashtra Officers’ Organisation v. UOI [2023] 153 taxmann.com 190 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 17(2) : Salary-Perquisite-Constitutional validity-Amendment by Finance Act, 2007-Challenge to amendment-Outcome of writ petition to be governed by adjudication in similar petitions pending at Principal Seat.[S. 15, Art. 226]

PCIT (E) v. National Health & Education Society [2023] 154 taxmann.com 636 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Business incidental to main objects-Surplus from a pharmacy operated by a hospital trust for its patients is ancillary to the main charitable object of medical relief and not taxable as business income.[S.2(13),10(23C)(via),11(4A),260A]

Balkrishna v. State of Maharashtra [2023] 151 taxmann.com 62 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest on compensation-Motor accident claims-Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-Interest awarded from date of claim petition until judgment of Court is not ‘income’ and, thus, not exigible to tax; no TDS deductible. [S. 2(28A), 194A]