Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Arunjeet Kaur (Smt.) v.ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 294 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Assessment order passed by non-jurisdictional AO-Invalid transfer on request of assessee-Mandate of law is not followed-Notice and order is bad in law.[S.114B, 127(4), 139A(5), 143(3), 148, 272B]

Shah Traders v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 641 / 246 DTR 41 / 172 taxmann.com 513 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 147 :Reassessment-Information received from Investigation Wing-Return was processed u/s143(1)-Survey-Accommodation entries-Reassessment is justified-On merit the matter is remanded to estimate of gross profit as applicable to genuine purchases. [S. 69C, 133A, 143(1)]

Mir Ibrahim Ali v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 233 TTJ 733 (Hyd)(Trib) Abbas Ali Akil v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 233 TTJ 733 (Hyd)(Trib)

S. 147:Reassessment-Limitation-Non-resident-No reference to TPO-The time-limit for completing the assessment under was available upto 31st March, 2023-Order passed on 8 th January, 2024-Barred by limitation-Additional legal ground on limitation is admitted. [S.92CA, 144C(13), 148 153(2), 153(4), 254(1)]

S.P. Singla Construction (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 559 / 245 DTR 357 (Chd)(Trib)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Sub-contractors-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment order is quashed. [S.148]

Sitac Re (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 971/ 174 taxmann.com 428 ((Delhi)(Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-limited scrutiny-Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-The addition made under s. 41(1) and disallowance of transmission charges are deleted.[S. 41(1)]

Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (IT) [2024] 168 taxmann.com 269 / (2025) 233 TTJ 83 (Mum)(Trib)

115JB : Company-Book profit-Income from operation of ships-Income offered income under deeming provision-Provsion of book profit is not applicable-DTAA-India Hing Kong. [S. 44B, 90(2), Art. 8]

Akshay Nitin Malu v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 491 / 245 DTR 353 / 173 taxmann.com 684 (Pune)(Trib)

S.115BAC:Tax on income of individuals and Hindu undivided family-Option-Form No 10E-New regime and old regime-The assessee cannot be forced to adopt the new regime-The action of the CPC in processing the return of income determining the total income under the new regime of taxation is quashed and set aside.[S. 139, Form No.10E]

Biocon Biologicals Ltd v. ACIT (2025)233 TTJ 930 / 170 taxmann.com 372 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Interest on outstanding receivables from AES-Outstanding dues beyond an agreed credit period are separate international transaction, which requires to be benchmarked separately and cannot be clubbed together with other transactions-Working capital adjustment subsumed accrued interest on trade receivables, and no separate adjustment should be made was not advanced before the TPO or the DRP-, Issue is restored back to the TPO.[R. 10A]

Pushpadevi Shivlal Rathi v. ITO (2025) 233 TTJ 12 / 245 DTR 16 (SMC) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Income Declaration Scheme, 2016-quoted wrong PAN No.-issue is restored to the AO for necessary verification. [Income Declaration Scheme, 2016]

Asha Daga v. Dy.CIT (2025) 233 TTJ 860/ 170 taxmann.com 199 (Raipur)(Trib)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Jewellley-Banl locker-Old jewellery was converted in to bullion-Addition is justified. [S. 132, 153A]