Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


CIT v. ACCEL Ltd. (2020) 429 ITR 36 / 273 Taxman 424 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 2(22)(e) : Dividend-Deemed dividend-Loan by subsidiary company to holding company-Business purposes-Loan cannot be treated as deemed dividend-No question of law. [S. 260A]

PDIT( Inv) v. Rajiv Yaduvanshi (2020)429 ITR 369 (Delhi)(HC)

Right to Information Act, 2005

2.(j): Right to information – Tax Informer — Tax evasion petition- Not entitled to information regarding progress of investigation following his report.[ Black Money ( Criminal Procedure Code , S. 482, Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Rules Act , 2015 , S. 51, 55 ]

CIT v. Sushila Devi Kejriwal (Smt.) (2020) 429 ITR 552 ( 2021 ) 201 DTR 333(Mad)(HC) PCIT v. M. Balasubramaniam (2020)429 ITR 556 (Mad)(HC)

Wealth-Tax Act , 1956

S.27A: Appeal -High Court – Monetary Limit — Applicable to wealth tax Appeals . [ S. 2(e ), IT Act , S.260A ]

PCIT v. M. Balasubramaniam (2020)429 ITR 556/ ( 2021 ) 201 DTR 333 (Mad)(HC) CIT v. Sushila Devi Kejriwal (Smt.) (2020) 429 ITR 552 (Mad)

Wealth-Tax Act , 1956

S. 2(e ) (a) : Asset — Urban land — Urban land on which construction has been prohibited — Not an asset for purposes of wealth -Tax .[ S.16(3) ]

Bhind District Co-Operative Central Bank Ltd. v Income-Tax Department (2019) 177 DTR 196/309 CTR 316/ (2020)429 ITR 121 (MP) (HC)

S. 43D : Public financial institutions -Accrual of income — Non-Banking financial company —Interest on non-performing assets — Cannot be assessed on accrual basis . [ S. 36(1) (vii), 36(1)(viia) ]

Anil Kumar Nevatia v.ITO ( 2021) The Chamber’s Journal – February – P. 165 ( ( Cal) (HC)

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – For computing the period of limitation the date of service of the order to be considered and not the date of the order [ S.254(3)]

Seema Jain ( Smt) v. PCIT ( 2021) The Chamber’ s Journal – February – P. 170 ( MP) (HC)

S. 237 : Refund -Excess deposit of advance tax – Mistake in the preparation of challan – Refund can be claimed only after due course of law . [ Art . 226 ]

State Bank of India v .ACIT ( 2021) 123 taxmann.com 447 ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 192 : Deduction at source – Salary – Leave travel allowance – Failure to deduct at source – Travel to foreign country and as well as to destinations in India in a composite itinerary -Cannot be considered as assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source [ .S.10(5) ]

DIT v. Autodesk Asia Pvt Ltd ( 2020) 275 Taxman 319/ 120 taxmann.com 324 / ( 2021) The Chamber’s Journal – February -P. 167 ( Karn) (HC)

S. 90 :Double taxation relief – Notification dated 18 -7 -2005 – Reducing the tax rate from 15% to 10% – Applicable for the entire year – DTAA- India – Singapore [ Art . 12 ]

Maninder Singh v. ACIT ( 2021) BCAJ- February -P.47 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 56 : Income from other sources – Award received in recognition of services to Indian Cricket From BCCI is exempt [ S. 12AA,56(2))(vii) ]