Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Manipal Sowbhagya Nidhi Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2019) 112 taxmann.com 325 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed Dy.CIT v. Manipal Sowbhagya Nidhi Ltd. (2019) 112 taxmann.com 326 / (2020) 268 Taxman 329 (SC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue-NBFC- Waiver of principal component of deposits and debentures-Capital receipts not liable to tax. [S. 28(i)]

Punjab Police Housing Corporation Ltd. v. PCIT (2020) 116 taxmann.com 402 (P&H)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest accrued-Grants received from State Government-Not liable to be taxed. [S.144, 147, 148]

M. Vishwanathan v. CCIT (2020) 116 taxmann.com 894 / 274 Taxman 411 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Compensation-Acquisition of non- Agricultural land-Corporation of Kochi-Compensation received is held to be not taxable. [Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, S. 96, Land Acquisition Act, 1894]

CIT v. ACCEL Ltd. (2020) 429 ITR 36 / 273 Taxman 424 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 2(22)(e) : Dividend-Deemed dividend-Loan by subsidiary company to holding company-Business purposes-Loan cannot be treated as deemed dividend-No question of law. [S. 260A]

PDIT( Inv) v. Rajiv Yaduvanshi (2020)429 ITR 369 (Delhi)(HC)

Right to Information Act, 2005

2.(j): Right to information – Tax Informer — Tax evasion petition- Not entitled to information regarding progress of investigation following his report.[ Black Money ( Criminal Procedure Code , S. 482, Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Rules Act , 2015 , S. 51, 55 ]

CIT v. Sushila Devi Kejriwal (Smt.) (2020) 429 ITR 552 ( 2021 ) 201 DTR 333(Mad)(HC) PCIT v. M. Balasubramaniam (2020)429 ITR 556 (Mad)(HC)

Wealth-Tax Act , 1956

S.27A: Appeal -High Court – Monetary Limit — Applicable to wealth tax Appeals . [ S. 2(e ), IT Act , S.260A ]

PCIT v. M. Balasubramaniam (2020)429 ITR 556/ ( 2021 ) 201 DTR 333 (Mad)(HC) CIT v. Sushila Devi Kejriwal (Smt.) (2020) 429 ITR 552 (Mad)

Wealth-Tax Act , 1956

S. 2(e ) (a) : Asset — Urban land — Urban land on which construction has been prohibited — Not an asset for purposes of wealth -Tax .[ S.16(3) ]

Bhind District Co-Operative Central Bank Ltd. v Income-Tax Department (2019) 177 DTR 196/309 CTR 316/ (2020)429 ITR 121 (MP) (HC)

S. 43D : Public financial institutions -Accrual of income — Non-Banking financial company —Interest on non-performing assets — Cannot be assessed on accrual basis . [ S. 36(1) (vii), 36(1)(viia) ]

Anil Kumar Nevatia v.ITO ( 2021) The Chamber’s Journal – February – P. 165 ( ( Cal) (HC)

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – For computing the period of limitation the date of service of the order to be considered and not the date of the order [ S.254(3)]

Seema Jain ( Smt) v. PCIT ( 2021) The Chamber’ s Journal – February – P. 170 ( MP) (HC)

S. 237 : Refund -Excess deposit of advance tax – Mistake in the preparation of challan – Refund can be claimed only after due course of law . [ Art . 226 ]