Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


CIT v. Kohinoor Foods Ltd. (2019) 414 ITR 249 / 180 DTR 41(Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue–AO examined the claim in original assessment proceedings–Rule of consistency is applied–Revision is held to be not valid. [S.143(3), 80HHC]

CIT v. Mereena Creations. (2019) 414 ITR 332 / ( 2020) 312 CTR 471 / 185 DTR 407 (SC)

S. 261 : Appeal-Supreme Court -Monetary limits-Tax effect of Less than of Rs. 1 crore-Appeal is allowed to withdrawn, leaving all the questions of law open. [S. 80HHC]

CIT v. ABC Papers Ltd. (2019) 414 ITR 668 (P&H)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court–Jurisdiction-Original Assessment in Delhi-Centralised at Ghaziabad after Search action-Punjab and Haryana High Court has no territorial jurisdiction to hear appeal. [S.143(3), 153A]

State Bank of India v. CIT (2019) 414 ITR 519 (P&H) (HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Insolvency proceedings initiated-Priority of debts-Creditor and department-Declaration of moratorium by National Company Law Tribunal against assesse-Petition is held to be infructuous [Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S. 14(1), Art. 226, 227]

CIT v. Google India P. Ltd. (2019) 414 ITR 608 / 177 DTR 385/310 CTR 497/( 2020) 269 Taxman 183 (Karn.) (HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Stay-Stay was granted subject to payment specified in the order.[S. 226]

CIT v. Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (2019) 414 ITR 551/ 264 Taxman 296 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 194D : Deduction at source-Insurance commission–Tax was rightly deducted on net commission excluding service tax.

CIT v. Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (2019) 414 ITR 551 / 264 Taxman 296(Bom.)(HC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source–Contractors-Services clerical in nature-Not technical or managerial services-Provisions of S.194C is applicable and not S.194J [S. 194J]

Rajan Jewellery v. CIT (2019) 414 ITR 621/177 DTR 369/308 CTR 602/ 266 Taxman 357 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 153B : Assessment-Search and seizure–Limitation-Order of assessment was despatched on last day prescribed–Not barred by limitation.[S. 132]

Rajan Jewellery. v. CIT (2019) 414 ITR 621/177 DTR 369/308 CTR 602/ 266 Taxman 357 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment–Search-Undisclosed income-Books of account found unreliable-Estimate of income on the basis of estimate is held to be valid. [S. 132(4)]

Rajender Kumar Sehgal v. ITO (2019) 414 ITR 286 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment–Notice issued in name of deceased assessee—Department attempting to correct error by changing name of entity in reasons to believe”—Not curable defects notice is invalid –Failure to issue notice u/s. 143(2) with in prescribed time – Reassessment is in valid. [S. 143(2), 147, 159, 29BB]