Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Bellsea Ltd. v. DIT (IT) (2020) 182 ITD 420 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Non-Resident-Contract for development of gas fields-Construction activity continued in India for a period of six months only-No Permanent Establishment in India-DTAA-India-Cyprus. [Art. 5(a)(g)]

Dr. K.R. Rajashekar Reddy v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 121 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Hindu undivided family-Capital gain-Individual or HUF-Remanded for fresh decision. [S. 139(5)]

PCIT v. Jewels Magnnum ( 2020) 120 taxmann.com 316/ 275 Taxman 134 ( Mad ) (HC) Editorial: Order in Jewels Magnnum v.ACIT ( 2016) 158 ITD 185 ( Chennai) (Trib) is affirmed .

S. 10AA : Special economic zones – Approval – Medallion – Manufacture of gold jewellery – Entitle for exemption .

PCIT v .IGate Computer Systems Ltd ( 2020) 114 taxmann. 680 ( Bom) (HC)

S. 10A : Free trade zone – Splitting up or reconstruction – Three units at different locations – Approval from Authority of Software Technology Park of India ( STPI) -Entitle to deduction .

CIT v. L & T Valdel Engineering (P.) Ltd (2020) 119 taxmann.com 443 / 275 Taxman 115 ( Karn) (HC)

S. 10A : Free trade zone – Splitting up or reconstruction – Purchase of new computers -Not owning the land – Site development of software programme – Eligible exemption.

TTK Healthcare TPA Pvt Ltd (No. 1) v. Dy CIT(TDS)( 2020) 195 DTR 209/ 317 CTR 684/ (2021) 430 ITR 134 (Karn)( HC)

S. 194J : Deduction at source – Fees for professional or technical services -Provision of third party administrator services to insured — Service providers have to deduct tax from payments made to Hospitals – Circular No. 8 Of 2009, dated 24-11-2009 (2009) 319 ITR (St.) 22) is not valid to extent it provides for penalty for infraction of Section 194J [ S.119(1), 271C , 273B, Art . 226 ]

PCIT v. Akshat Shah( 2020) 193 DTR 77/ 316 CTR 817 / (2021) 430 (Guj)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission – Offer of small portion of disputed amount voluntarily — Justified in accepting the offer .[ S.245D(4), Art, 226 ]

V. Sabitamani v. ACIT(2020) 194 DTR 301/ 317 CTR 463 / (2021)430 ITR 490 (Mad)(HC)

S. 32: Depreciation — Actual cost — Purchase of second-hand Windmill —Disallowance of depreciation is held to be justified .[ 43(1), Expln. 3, 143(3), 147 ]

New Era Shipping Ltd. v. CIT ( 2020) 196 DTR 137/(2021) 430 ITR 431 / 318 CTR 400 (Bom) (HC)

S.147:Reassessment —Failure to furnish reasons recorded by Assessing Officer — Furnishing the recorded reasons when the matter was pending before Appellate Tribunal-Tribunal remanding the matter – Order of Tribunal remanding matter and subsequent assessment and demand notice set aside [ S.148 , 254(1) ]

Karle International Pvt Ltd. v. ACIT ( 2020) 196 DTR 473/ 274 Taxman 461 /(2021)430 ITR 74/ 318 CTR 478 (Karn)(HC) . Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed , ACIT v. Karle International (P) Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 97 (SC)

S. 10B: Export oriented undertakings – Loss -Set off -Export oriented units -Deduction cannot be thrust- Entitled to set off losses from export oriented units against profits of domestic tariff area unit[ S.(10B(6)(ii), 70, 72, 74 ]