Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Manjula (Smt) v.ITO ( 2019) 178 DTR 361/ 309 CTR 287 ( Karn) (HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery – Assessee deemed in default – Natural justice – Stay -Recovery – When an opportunity of personal audience is requested the law requires due consideration- Rejection of application without affording an opportunity of hearing is set aside- Directed the AO to pass speaking order after giving an opportunity of hearing . [ S.220(3), Art 14. ]

Lalhibhai Kanjibhai Mandalia v PCIT ( 2019) 180 DTR 49 (Guj) (HC)

S. 132 : Search and seizure – Loan transaction is reflected in the books of account and return filed by the assesee- No material basis of which a reasonable person could have formed the opinion and lack of jurisdiction – Search action is held to be invalid [ Art. 226 ]

PCIT v. Wadhawan Designs ( 2019) 184 DTR 299 / (2020) 313 CTR 173 (Delhi ) (HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits –Bogus Purchases – Name of supplier could not be traced – No justification for applying GP rate – Addition as unexplained cash credit is up held [ S.37(1) ,69C 145 ]

National Company v. ACIT ( 2019) 178 DTR 305 (Mad) (HC)

S.45(4) : Capital gains – Distribution of capital asset -Retirement- On retirement the amount received does not represent consideration in lieu of relinquishment of his interest in the partnership asset – Addition cannot be made in the assessment of the firm [ S.45 ]

CIT v. Anand, S. M. (2019) 311 CTR 795 (Karn )(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Second proviso to S. 40(a)(ia) of the Act inserted by Finance Act, 2012 is clarificatory and retrospective in nature – No disallowance can be made where the recipient of the amount has already discharged his tax liability therein .[ S. 40(a) ,139(1) ]

CIT ( E ) v. Shiv Kumar Sumitra Devi Smarak Shikshan Sansthan ( 2019) 182 DTR 7 ( All) (HC)

S. 12A : Registration –Trust or institution- Assessment was not pending before AO but before the Tribunal -Granting of registration for the AY. 2011-12 is held to be not valid. [ S. 11, 12 ]

Xstrata Coal Marketing AG v. Dalmia Bharat (Cement) Ltd. (2019) 311 CTR 597/183 DTR 315 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vii):Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Fees for technical services – Monies received towards arbitration costs and legal costs – Amount payable as per decree – Not liable to deduct tax at source -DTAA-India – Switzerland [S.190 , Art .22 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 S.48 ]

PCIT v. K. P. R. Developers Ltd. (2019) 311 CTR 832/ 183 DTR 406 / 274 Taxman 449(Mad.)(HC)

S.2(14)(iii): Capital asset-Agricultural land- Capital gains- Agricultural lands and beyond 8 k.m., from the notified cities – Revenue records showing as agricultural lands- Department to prove that the entries in the revenue records and the patta were false or bogus- Entitle to exemption .[ S.45 ]

Experion Development Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT ( 2020 ) 422 ITR 355/ 115 taxmann.com 338 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –Bogus share capital- Parent company – Indian subsidiaries- Information from investigation wing – Credit worthiness of the investing company- Reassessment notice is held to be valid .[ S.68 , 148 ]

Salem Sree Ramavilas Chit Company v. DCIT( 2020) 423 ITR 525/ 114 taxmann.com 492/ 273 Taxman 68/187 DTR 217/ 313 CTR 473 (Mad)(HC), www.itatonline.org . Editorial : Order set aside Dy. CIT v. Salem Sree Ramavilas Chit Co. P. Ltd. (2021)437 ITR 597 / 323 CTR 207(Mad) (HC) Dy. CIT v. Salem Sree Ramavilas Chit Co. P. Ltd. (2021)437 ITR 597 (Mad) (HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment – E-Assessment – Post demonetization-The AO should at least call for an explanation in writing before proceeding to conclude that the amount collected by the assessee was unusual- The AO could have come to a definite conclusion on facts after fully understanding the nature of business of the assessee-Order of AO is set aside and directed the AO is directed to dispose the matter with in sixty days of receipt of the order . [S.69A ,115BBE.]