Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Aon Consulting (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 171 taxmann.com 336 / 346 CTR 121 / 252 DTR 476 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-MAP settlement under India-USA DTAA applicable only to transactions covered under MAP-ALP of non-US transactions cannot be determined on basis of MAP framework-ALP to be independently determined under Act and Rules-DTAA-India-USA [S.92CA, R.10B, Art. 27]

PCIT v. A.H. Multisoft (P) Ltd. (2025) 305 Taxman 347 / 346 CTR 233 / 252 DTR 431 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Issue of shares at premium-Valuation of unquoted shares-DCF method-FMV determined on basis of expert valuation report cannot be rejected merely due to general disclaimers-Valuation under DCF method permissible under Rule 11UA-Assessee’s substantiated valuation to be accepted-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 56(2)(viib), R. 11UA]

CIT (IT) v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. (2025) 176 taxmann.com 482 / 346 CTR 109 / 252 DTR 305 (Uttarakhand)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Short deduction-Disallowance cannot be made for short deduction of tax at source. [S. 194C, 194J]

PCIT v. Watson Pharma (P) Ltd. (2025) 173 taxmann.com 957 /346 CTR 82 / 249 DTR 25 (Bom)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bad debt-Advances given in the course of business written off-Genuineness of advances not doubted-Books audited by statutory auditors-Write-off allowable as deduction-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 28(i), 36(1)(vii), 260A]

PCIT v. Watson Pharma (P) Ltd. (2025) 173 taxmann.com 957/346 CTR 82 / 249 DTR 25 (Bom)(HC)

S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Site transfer income-Derived from-Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Tribunal had not given any reasons as to how ‘Site Transfer Income’ constituted income derived from business of undertaking, matter was remanded back to Tribunal for deciding ground of deduction under section 10B qua ‘Site Transfer Income’. [S. 254(1)]

Shri Ganesh Builders Ltd. v. DCIT (Nag.)(Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits – Cash payment exceeding prescribed limit – Purchase of land – Amount not claimed as expenditure – No disallowance permissible – Addition deleted – Stamp duty value difference is less than 10 % – Amendment made in section 50C(1) of the Act by inserting third proviso by Finance Act, 2018, with effect from April 01, 2018 is curative and retrospective- Disallowance deleted . [S. 40(a)(ia),43CA, 50C ]

ITO v. Ratna Aggarwal ( Delhi) (Trib ) www.itatonlinee.org.

S. 56 : Income from other sources – Immovable property received without consideration – Family settlement – Gift deed executed pursuant to family arrangement – Property received from member of HUF – Not taxable as deemed income – Revenue’s appeal dismissed.[ S.2(47), 56(2)(vii)(b) ]

Mohammed Salih v. ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 514 / 251 DTR 396 (Ker.)(HC). Editorial: ACIT v. Mohammed Salih (2025) 303 Taxman 529 / 345 CTR 503 / 251 DTR 385 (Ker.)(HC).

S. 281B: Provisional attachment-Bank account-Reassessment proceedings-Seizure of cash from car-Attachment unsustainable in absence of tangible material and in view of security already furnished before Magistrate Court-Bank account not covered under s. 281B [S 132B, 142A, 226(4); Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Samhitha, 2023, S. 497; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S. 60(1); GST Act, 2017; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 451; Art. 226]

Fortune Infovision (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 174 taxmann.com 648/ 345 CTR 752 / 251 DTR 263 (Raj)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Belated deposit of TDS-Voluntarily deposited TDS along with interest before issuance of show cause notice-Delayed compliance of provision of deducting and depositing TDS would not suffice for grant of prosecution sanction. [S. 279, Art. 226]

Fortune Infovision (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 174 taxmann.com 648/ 345 CTR 752 / 251 DTR 263 (Raj)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Belated deposit of TDS-Voluntarily deposited TDS along with interest before issuance of show cause notice-Delayed compliance of provision of deducting and depositing TDS would not suffice for grant of prosecution sanction. [S. 279, Art. 226]