Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Bhagwan Mahaveer Jain Relief Trust v. CIT(E) (2025) 211 ITD 454 (Raipur)(Trib.)

S. 80G : Donation-Rejection of application-Violation of natural justice-Matter is remanded back to CIT(E). [S.80G(5)(iv)(B)]

Rotary Charity Trust. v. CIT (2025) 211 ITD 297 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 80G : Donation-Registration-Mentioning of wrong section-Matter is remanded to the file of CIT(E) with a direction to grant final approval to assessee under clause (iii) to first proviso to section 80G(5), if assessee was otherwise found eligible.[S.80G(5), Form 10AB]

Kailash Ramavatar Goenka. v. ACIT (2025) 211 ITD 317 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Un accounted cash-Seized material, diary notings-Transfer within group-Taxed in respective entities-Addition is deleted-Unexplained receipts and payments-Estimation of gross receipts-CIT(A) is justified in adopting a profit rate of 30 per cent on total receipts, based on principle of taxing real income.

DCIT v. Triton Hotels and Resorts (P.) Ltd. (2025) 211 ITD 1 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Search and seizure-Seized document was found from third party premises-Addition is deleted-Payment to travel agent-Payment received on the basis of rooms booked-Addition is deleted. [S. 132]

Ajay Data v. ACIT (2025) 211 ITD 701 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Search-Cash withdrawal-No explanation for reason for withdrawal-Addition cannot be made-Jewellery-Silver articles-Residence and bank locker-Joint family-Explanation have to be considered as belonging to family as a whole-Addition is deleted. [S. 132]

Anil Dhansukhlal v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 236 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Immoveable property-Non-Resident-Source of investment-Produced bank statement-Addition is deleted.

Kajari Banerjee (Smt.) v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 358 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Investment in flat which was made in earlier year-Reflected in balance sheet-Addition is deleted.

Ankur Goyal. v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 571 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Immovable property-Loan from mother-Creditworthiness is established-Addition is deleted-Interest paid to mother-Matter remanded to the AO for verification. [S. 22, 24]

DCIT v. J.A. Infracon (P.) Ltd. (2025) 211 ITD 471 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application money and share premium-Filed necessary details-Deletion of order by CIT(A) is affirmed.[S. 133(6)]

Spectra Equipment (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 61 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Cash deposit-Demonetisation-Justified in treating as unexplained and lev levy tax as prescribed in section 115BBE of the Act.[S.2(37A,),115BBE, 131, 133(6)]