S. 194C : Deduction at source – Contractors – Payment made to production house for programme software purchase , equipment hire etc . whether contract or technical services –Substantial question of law admitted by High Court [ S.194J, 260A ]
S. 194C : Deduction at source – Contractors – Payment made to production house for programme software purchase , equipment hire etc . whether contract or technical services –Substantial question of law admitted by High Court [ S.194J, 260A ]
S. 194C : Deduction at source – Contractors – Placement fees/carriage fees to cable operators and MSO/DTH operators, which were payment for work contract and fees for technical services [ S.194J ]
S.192: Deduction at source – Salary – Commission paid to non-executives/independent directors could not be treated as salary and, not liable to deduct tax at source .[ S.15 ]
S. 147 : Reassessment – Cash credits-Accommodation entries -Bogus companies – information from investigation wing -No nexus with reasons recorded for initiating reassessment proceedings – Reassessment was held to be bad in law . [ S.68 , 143(1) ,148 ]
S.147: Reassessment – Cash credits –Information from investigation Wing – Loan from company working as an entry operator and earning bogus funds to provide advances to various persons- Reassessment was held to be valid [ S.143(1) ]
S.145 : Method of accounting -License fee -Merely on the basis of billing income cannot be assessed unless the income accrues to the assessee -Rule of constancy is followed .[S.5 ]
S.142(2A): Inquiry before assessment– Special audit–Court cannot go into sufficiency of reasons assigned by assessing authority for directing Special Audit
S. 115JB : Book profit – lease equalization charges can be deducted while computing book profit – Provisions for non-performing assets are liable to be adjusted while computing book profit
S. 115JB : Book profit –Provision towards electricity tariff cannot be added to book profit as it is not a contingent liability .
S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arms’ length price – There was no justification for enhancement of ALP by disallowing allocation of overhead office expenses.