Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Skylight Hospitality LLP v. ACIT( 2018) 254 Taxman 390/ 166 DTR 421 / 303 CTR 130 (SC) , www.itatonline.org Editorial. Order in Skylight Hospitality LLP v. ACIT ( 2018) 254 Taxman 109/ 166 DTR 409/ 303 CTR 131 ( Delhi) (HC) is affirmed

S. 147 : Reassessment –Clerical mistake- The object and purpose behind S. 292B is to ensure that technical pleas on the ground of mistake, defect or omission should not invalidate the assessment proceedings, when no confusion or prejudice is caused due to non-observance of technical formalities [ S. 148, 292B ]

DCIT v. VSB Investment Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 16 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment- Reassessment on the basis of information received from investigation wing for alleged accommodation entries and denial by parties the reopening was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]

Ambrish Manoj Dhupelia. v. DCIT (2018 ) 168 ITD 407 (SMC) (Mum) (Trib.)

S.147: Reassessment- Failure to disclose beneficial owner of deposits in foreign Bank accounts -Reassessment was held to be justified [ S.69 , 148 ]

Way 2 Wealth Brokers P. Ltd. v. (2018)61 ITR 259 (Bang) (Trib)

S.147: Reassessment — Issue was not considered in the original assessment proceedings hence reassessment was held to be valid. As regard the allowability of depreciation on stock exchange membership the matter was remanded .[ S. 32, 148 ]

CIT v. Jandu Construction Co. (2018) 61 ITR 235 (Chand) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment — Reopening on same issues as considered in rectification proceedings earlier was held to be not valid [ S. 148 ]

Veer Vardhman Finance Investment Pvt. LTD. v. DCIT (2018) 61 ITR 669 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment — Non-speaking order disposing of Assessee’s objection against reassessment — Reassessment was held to be invalid [ S.68, 148 ]

Ramesh Salecha HUF v. ITO (2018) 61 ITR 632 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment — Failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) , reassessment was held to be in valid [ S. 143(2) , 148 , 292BB]

DCIT v. Century Textiles And Industries Ltd. (2018) 61 ITR 647/ 162 DTR 247 /191 TTJ 483 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Derived from- Export benefits – Decision of the Supreme Court was operative when the return was filed – Reassessment was held to be valid [ S. 80IC, 148 ]

Meta Plast Engineering P. Ltd. v. ITO ( Delhi)(Trib) , www.itatonline.org

S. 147: Reassessment – Bogus accommodation entries – Order was passed before expiry of four weeks of passing the orders of objection – Non application of mind while recording reasons – Order was held to be bad in law [ S. 148 ]

Sunrise Broking Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 400 ITR 337 (Guj) (HC)

S. 147: Reassessment —Deemed dividend – Notice based on information received from another assessee’s assessing authority was held to be valid [ S. 2(22)( e ), 143(1), 148 ]