Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Vijayalakshmi Mohanakrishnan v. NFAC (2025) 478 ITR 470 (Mad)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Validity-Unable to access Department’s portal-Order quashed-Matter remanded for reconsideration subject to payment of costs of Rs.10000 by assessee to the Adyar Cancer Institute, Chennai. [S. 142(1), Art. 226]

Devendran Coal International Pvt. Ltd. v.NFAC(2025) 478 ITR 432 (Mad)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Allegation that assessee had not been heard not proved-Writ petition dismissed-Given liberty to file statutory appeal.[S. 142(1), 147, 148, 246A, Art. 226]

Srijan Capital Advisors LLP. v ACIT (2025) 478 ITR 476 (Karn)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Audit-Profession or business-Principle of natural justice-Order treating return as invalid without assigning reason not valid-Order set aside. [S. 139(9), Art. 226]

Pavai Varam Educational Trust v. CPIO (2025) 478 ITR 417 (Mad)(HC)

S.139: Return of income-Limitation-Where assessment order was passed and consequential demand raised by treating return and audit reports as belated without considering CBDT Notification dated 31-12-2020 extending time limits due to COVID-19 under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, the order was unsustainable-Return and audit reports filed on 14-02-2021 were within extended time up to 31-03-2021-Assessment order and demand set aside and Department directed to open e-portal to enable assessee to upload reports, if any. [Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, Art.226]

PCIT v. DCM Shriram Ltd. (2025) 478 ITR 385 / 170 taxmann.com 631 (Delhi) (HC)g

S.92BA : Transfer pricing-Specified domestic transaction-Arm’s length price-Market value of electricity-Indian Energy Exchange not comparable to supply by State Electricity Boards-Comparable uncontrolled price method not applicable in case of material dissimilarity-Deletion of transfer pricing adjustment justified. [S.80-IA(8), 92B, 92BA, 92C, 92F, 260A]

New Delhi Television Ltd v. ACIT (2025) 478 ITR 536 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92B : Transfer pricing-International transaction-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-Corporate guarantee-Tribunal remanding matter to Assessing Officer for reference to Remand of order confined only to extent of examining whether undertaking of corporate guarantee constituted international transaction-The principal direction of remit by the Tribunal and a de novo exercise was liable to be undertaken by the Assessing Officer, the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer and the consequent draft assessment order also stood set aside [S.92CA, 260A]

PCIT v. Deepak Banwarilal Agarwal (2025) 478 ITR 572 (Guj)(HC) PCIT v. Dilkhush Babel (2025) 478 ITR 611 (Guj)(HC) PCIT v. Enviro Control Pvt. Ltd (2025) 478 ITR 683 (Guj)(HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-Business of import and export and trading of diamonds-Information from Investigation Wing-Tribunal restricting disallowance to six per cent. based on assessee’s turnover and net profit justified-No question of law arose.[S. 147, 260A]

PCIT v. Ambalal Chimanlal Patel [2024] 162 taxmann.com 892 / (2025) 478 ITR 514 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Trading in shares-Claim of long-term capital gains-Shares of company suspended by stock exchange Cannot be reason to make additions in absence of any material to suggest that purchase and sale of such shares were bogus-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 10(38), 45, 260A]

CIT v. U.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd[2024] 162 taxmann.com 126 / (2025) 478 ITR 449 (All)(HC)

S. 43D : Public financial institutions-State financial corporation Interest on bad debts-Mercantile system of accounting-Cash basis-Interest of bad debts on cash basis-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 145, Income-tax Rules, 1962, R. 6EA.]

CIT(E) v. United Way of Baroda (2025) 478 ITR 530/176 taxmann.com 358 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP rejected, CIT(E) v. United Way of Baroda (2025) 306 Taxman 269/ 478 ITR 535 (SC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Organising cultural event-Income from ticket sales by organising dance events and food stalls-Not business activity-Denial of exemption was not justified.[S. 2(15), 12, 13(8), 260A.]