Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


PCIT v. Aditya Coke Pvt. Ltd. (2024)460 ITR 734 (Guj)(HC)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Deletion of addition on facts-No substantial question of law.[S. 37(1), 143(3), 260A]

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. ITO (OSD) (2024)460 ITR 66 (Mad)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Amounts paid for services of employees of parent company-No Evidence that amount was reimbursement of actual expenditure as such services by parent company-Disallowance is affirmed.

Academy of Medical Sciences v. CIT (2024)460 ITR 592/ 297 Taxman 2 (SC) Editorial :Refer Academy of Medical Sciences v. CIT (2018) 403 ITR 74 (Ker)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Recipient filing belated loss return and not paying taxes on income declared-Liable to pay tax deducted at source with interest.[S.201(1)]

CIT v. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. (2024)460 ITR 232/161 taxmann.com 218 (Mad)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue Royalty for use of logo of company-Expenses on employees stock option plan-Revenue expenditure.[Companies Act, 1956,2(15A) 2((37)]

PCIT v. Emmsons International Ltd. (2024)460 ITR 715 /158 taxmann.com 10 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP rejected, PCIT v. Emmsons International Ltd. (2024)297 Taxman 4/460 ITR 718 (SC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Derivative contracts-Forward contracts-Foreign Exchange fluctuation loss-Loss is allowable. [S. 28(i)]

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. ITO (OSD) (2024)460 ITR 66 (Mad)(HC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Amounts paid as royalty to parent company for use of its trademark-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Employees stock option-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Interest on excess refund is not deductible.[S.143(1)

PCIT v.Emmsons International Ltd. (2024)460 ITR 718/ 297 Taxman 4 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v Emmsons International Ltd. (2024)460 ITR 715 /158 taxmann.com 10 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Loss on account of fluctuation in rate of foreign exchange-Derivative contracts-Hedge against exchange risk in respect of export proceeds receivable in foreign exchange-Loss is allowable-Special leave petition dismissed.[S. 28(i) Art. 136]

PCIT v. Rites Ltd. (2024)460 ITR 593/297 Taxman 5 (SC) Editorial: Refer, PCIT v. PEC Ltd (2023) 451 ITR 436 /221 DTR 481/ 330 CTR 593/ 291 Taxman 281 (Delhi)(HC) / PCIT v. Rites Ltd. (2023) 451 ITR 436 / 221 DTR 481/ 330 CTR 593/ (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Corporate Social Responsibility-Special Leave Petition Dismissed on facts-Leaving Question Of Law Open. [Art. 136]

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. v. ITO (OSD) (2024)460 ITR 66 (Mad)(HC)

S. 36(1)(vii) :Bad debt-Amounts should be actually written off in profit and loss account-Allowable as deduction.

CIT v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. [2009] 180 Taxman 543/ (2024)460 ITR 159 (P&H)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Claimed depreciation in accordance with Appendix I-No substantial question of law. [ITR. 5(1), 5(1)(IA)]