S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Income from other sources-Fixed deposit-Deemed Municipality working in name and style as ‘Sachin Notified Area’-Issue of interest on fixed deposit which was assessable under head ‘income from other sources’, had been examined by Assessing Officer during assessment stage by conducting necessary enquiry, order of AO sought to be revised in impugned order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to interest of revenue for reason of any lack of inquiry-Delay of 208 days for filing appeal is condoned. [S.10(20), 56 253]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-subscription fee for providing access to database pertaining to legal and law related information-Business profits-No permanent establishment-Not taxable in India-Revision is not valid-DTAA-India-USA [S. 9(1)(i), 9(1)(vii), art.7]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Co-Operative society-Interest and dividend from Co-Operative Banks-Allowable as deduction-Revision order is quashed.[S.80P(2)(d)]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Transfer has taken place in earlier years-Provisions of section 56(2)(x) applicable with effect from 1-4-2017 would not be applicable to assessee during relevant year.[S. 56(2)(x)]

S. 255 : Appellate Tribunal-Procedure-Functions-Conflict of interest-CIT-DR is not empowered to file additional grounds of appeal or miscellaneous application including application raising preliminary objection without consent of Assessing Officer-Application of CIT-DR alleging ‘conflict of interest’ was frivolous and mischievous-Department is advised to provide proper training to him before assigning him to a judicial forum-Tribunal is not right place to disqualify a lawyer or law firm as a regulatory measure; such matters could be dealt with by appropriate bodies like Bar Council of India (BCI).[S. 253]

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Attachment of fixed deposit by ED as well as Income-tax Authorities-Till attachment would continue assessee would not be required to pay any further payment and stay was to be granted-In event attachment of bank accounts as vacated or revoked or disturbed or modified, assessee shall deposit 20 per cent of outstanding liability [S. 254(1), 281B]

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Non-consideration of decision of High Court or Supreme Court could said to be a mistake which could be rectified-Employees’ contribution to superannuation fund was deposited after due date-Rectification of Revenue is allowed.[S. 36(1)(va), 43B]

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-Calculation of 20 per cent outstanding-TDS deducted must be considered.[S. 156, 254(1)]

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Consideration above 50 lakhs-Failure to deduct tax at source and failure to file Form No 26A-Interest is leviable.[S.194IA, 201(1), 201(IA)]

S. 199 : Deduction at source-Credit for tax deducted-Transfer of business-Transfer of income-TDS credit TDS credit cannot not be denied merely because credit of TDS didn’t reflect in Form 26AS of assessee. [Rule 37BA(2), Form 26AS]