S. 147 : Reassessment-Capital gains-Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Alternate remedy-Writ petition is dismissed. [S.54F 143(3),148, Art.226]

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Futures & Options-Loss was accepted in the original assessment-Information received from insight portal-No independent verification-No failure to disclose material facts-Notice and order disposing the objection was quashed and set aside [S. 28(1), 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Futures & options loss-Borrowed satisfaction-No failure to disclose-Notice quashed [S. 71, 148, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-Cash credits-Bogus sales-Special Audit report-Reopening based only on NSEL information-Delay of 122 days not been satisfactorily explained-SLP dismissed both for delay and on merits. [S. 68, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-High Court affirmed the order of the Tribunal on the ground that based on very same document re assessment was not justified-Special leave petition filed against the order of High Court was dismissed on ground of low tax effect. [S. 50C, 148, Art. 136]

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts-Schedule bank-Order of High Court quashing the reassessment notice and consequential order was quashed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed on account of delay of 162 days as well as on merits. [S. 36(1)(viia), 143(3), Art. 136]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Loss in speculation business-No failure to disclose material facts-SLP dismissed [S. 73, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Project completion method-Real estate development-Assessing Officer followed percentage completion method-Alternative remedy-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 43CB, 144B, ICDS III & IV, Art. 226]

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Personal hearing-Natural justice-Video conference-Order of the Assessing Officer was quashed and set a side-Statutory authority was directed to afford a personal hearing to assessee through video conferencing. [S. 143(2), 144B(7), Art. 226]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Limitation-Date of filing original return to be considered for limitation, not date defects were removed-SLP dismissed. [S. 139(1), 139(9), Art. 136]