Author: ksalegal

Author Archive


Seeta Nayyar v. ACIT ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline.org .

S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence – Development agreement – Indexed cost of acquisition – Assessee entitled to indexation on entire property and not restricted to 22.5% land share – Multiple floors in same redeveloped building constitute one residential house – Deduction u/s 54 allowable.[ S.2(47), 45 , 48 ]

Kamaljeet Kaur Gill v. JCIT (2025) 344 CTR 737 / 249 DTR 433 / 174 taxmann.com 53 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 271E : Penalty-Repayment of loan or deposit-Reasonable cause-Bona fide transaction duly reflected in books-No intention to evade tax-Penalty not sustainable. [S. 269T, 273B]

Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 344 CTR 313 / 249 DTR 97 / 174 taxmann.com 418 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Inadvertent data feeding mistake in the return-Audit report-Voluntary disclosure of the income-Penalty deleted. [S. 44B, 115JB, 139(5)]

PCIT v. Mahavir Ashok Enterprises (P) Ltd. [2024] 167 taxmann.com 396 / (2025) 344 CTR 628 (Chhattisgarh) (HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Survey-Lack of proper enquiry-Specific show-cause notice-Excess stock-Principal CIT unjustified in invoking revisionary jurisdiction-Tribunal order affirmed. [S. 69, 115BBE, 133A, 260A]

Jharkhand State Cricket Association v. CIT (E) (2025) 344 CTR 540 / 249 DTR 233 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Review-Order passed on concession given by counsel-Review not maintainable. [S. 260A(7), Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order 47, R. 1]

PCIT v Nagar Dairy (P) Ltd. (2025) 344 CTR 341 / 248 DTR 217 / 172 taxmann.com 111 /480 ITR 354 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Cross objections-Right of respondent-assessee to file cross-objections-The right to prefer cross-objections is statutorily recognised by S. 253(4), Parliament chose not to confer such a right upon a respondent in an appeal referable to the former-Legislative silence may sometimes resonate louder than express words and which may be either ambiguous or capable of more than one interpretation-Cross objection not maintainable . [S.253 (4), 256(1), 260A(3), 260A(4), 260A(6), 260A(7), Civil Procedure Code, 1908,S.100, Order XLI R. 22]

Poonam Pujari v. Assistant Registrar of ITAT (2005) 344 CTR 429 / 247 DTR 93 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Failure to appear due to indisposition of advocate-Order of Tribunal quashed and set aside-Appeal restored.[S. 254(1), Art. 226]

Neel Kumar Ajmera Alias Nilesh Ajmera v. PCIT (2025) 344 CTR 797 / 344 CTR 797 / 174 taxmann.com 242 (MP)(HC)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Appeal-Delay of 1797 days-Reasonable cause-Affidavit-Liberal approach in condonation-Tribunal not justified in dismissing appeal without considering explanation-Delay condoned and matter remanded. [S. 254(1), 260A]

Huawei Telecommunications India Company (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 344 CTR 433 249 DTR 134 / 173 taxmann.com 396 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 245: Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Recovery-Revenue has not issued any prior notice or intimation for making adjustment-Order set aside and refund directed to be paid with interest. [S. 220, 222, 237, Art. 226]

Fasttrack Tieup (P) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 344 CTR 78 / 248 DTR 113 /172 taxmann.com 541 (Delhi)(HC).

S. 222: Collection and recovery-Certificate to Tax Recovery Officer-Priority of secured creditor over Government dues-Prohibitory order-Prior hypothecation-Revenue’s inaction-Attachment cannot impede auction sale.[Art. 226]