Where assessee-company was engaged in providing software development services to its AEs, a company engaged in providing both software products as well as software development services could not be accepted as valid comparable. A company engaged in providing product development services and rendering on-site services in one overall segment of ‘Information Technology services’ could not be accepted as valid comparable. A company mainly engaged in outsourcing its business activities could not be accepted as comparable.A company providing information services could not be accepted as valid comparable. (AY. 2010-11)
BMC Software India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 189 ITD 57 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Software consultancy-Functional similarity-Company engaged in providing both software products as well as software development services could not be accepted as comparable-A company engaged in providing information services could not be accepted as comparable-A company providing information services could not be accepted as comparable.