Category: Tax Laws

Archive for the ‘Tax Laws’ Category


Umesh Garg v. UOI (2024) 297 Taxman 91 (All.)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020.

S. 4 : Filing of declaration -Delay in filing of appeal – Rejection of application by Designated Authority is affirmed .[ IT Act , 271AAB , Art. 226 ]

Neelam Ajit Phatarpekar (Mrs.) v. Asst. CIT (2024)462 ITR 467 /336 CTR 749 (Bom)( HC)

Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020

S. 3: Declaration- Rejection of declaration — Erroneous determination of tax — Part payment made is not considered – Disabled to file revised Form 3 due to technical glitches on Website – Marginal delay in filing Form 4 attributable to respondents — Department is directed to accept declaration subject to making of payments of tax. [ S. 3, 5(1),5(2) , Art. 226 ]

Dass Media Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT [2023] 156 taxmann.com 286 / (2024)460 ITR 521/336 CTR 814 (Mad)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (2020) 422 ITR 121 (St)

S. 4: Filing of declaration – -Refund — Set-Off of refund —Capital gains for assessment year 2016 -17 – Set off of demand for the Assessment year 2014 -15 -Direction is issued to Department to make suitable adjustments to transfer amount paid under Scheme for Assessment year 2016-17 .[ S. 3, 5 , ITAct , S.244A , Art . 226 ]

Ardent Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT [2023] 152 taxmann.com 496 / (2024)460 ITR 421 (Delhi)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (2020) 422 ITR 121 (St)

S.2(1)(a) : Appellant – Declarant – Pendency of appeal – Physically and digital mode – No difference between appeal admitted physical and digital mode – Rejection is not valid .[ ITAct, 1961 , S. 254(2), Art . 226 ]

Prateek Chitkara v .UOI (2024)460 ITR 673 (Delhi)(HC)

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income And Assets) And Imposition Of Tax Act, 2015 .

S. 10(1): Undisclosed Foreign Assets — Evasion of tax — Look-out circular banning travel — Pendency of appeal – The look-out circular shall stand modified to an intimation in terms of clause 6(I) of the Office Memorandum of 2021, which states that in cases where there is no cognizable offence under the Indian Penal Code and other penal laws ; the look-out circular subject cannot be detained or arrested or prevented from leaving the country-The originating agency can only request that they be informed about the arrival and departure of the subject in such cases. [ S. 10(3), 41 , ITAct , 131(IA) 133A 153A , Art. 226

Shobha Harish Thawani (Ms.) v. Jt. CIT (2023) 154 taxmann.com564 / 226 TTJ 593(Mum) ( Trib.) Editorial : Appeal is pending for admission before Bombay High Court .

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015

S. 43:Penalty for failure to furnish return of income an information or furnish inaugurate particulars of an asset ( Including financial interest in any entity ) outside India -Did not disclose foreign asset in ITR Schedule FA, order of Commissioner (Appeals) confirming levy of penalty under section 43 of Black Money Act is affirmed . [ ITAct, S.139 ]

Indian Institute of Banking and Finance v. CIT (2023)107 ITR 250 / 226 TTJ 43(Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-University or educational institution must exist solely for educational purposes and not for purpose of profit each year-Earning royalties from publications-Not existing solely for education but for profit-Not entitled to exemption. [S.10(23C)(vi) 10A,10B, 80IB]

Narendrakumar Chunilal Soni v. JCIT (2023)104 ITR 36 (SN) (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Sale of immovable property to agriculturist from small village-Banking facilities not available-Reasonable cause-Levy of penalty is deleted. [S. 273B]

Talwar Jewellers v. ACIT (2023) 102 ITR 26 (SN) (Chd) (Trib.)

S: 143(3) : Assessment-Bogus purchases-Inventory and Closing stock not disputed-Addition is deleted. [S. 132(4), 147, 148, 153A]

Shri Rajkot Vishashrimali Jain Samaj. v. ITO (2023) 200 ITD 662 /225 TTJ 992 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Form No 10B-Audit report-Delay condoned by CIT(E)-Denial of exemption is not justified-Return filed under section 139(4)-Exemption cannot be denied-Provisions of section 13(9) would attract only when assessee claims benefit of section 11(2) and its scope would not extend to other sub-sections of section 11. [S. 12A (1)(ba), 13(9), 139(1), 139 (4),13(9), Form No.10B]