Category: GST Law

Archive for the ‘GST Law’ Category


Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. v. State of Karnataka (2020) 35 SCC 354/(2020) 78 GST 98/MANU/SC/1674/2019

Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957
S. 5C:Levy of tax on the transfer of the right to use any goods- Transfer of right to use – Charter Party Agreement [ Andra Pradesh General Sales tax Act 1957 , S 5E, Constitution of India , Art, 28, 246(4), 286, 297(3), 366(29A)(d) ]

UOI v. Mohit Mineral (P) Ltd (2019) 2 SCC 599/AIR 2018 SC 318/(2018) 69 GST 743 (SC)

Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017
S.11: Other provisions relating to Cess- GST Compensation Cess – Valid – Traceable to Articles 246A, 248 as well as 270 [Constitution of India Arts , 39, 245, 246(1) 246A, 248, 254, 269, 270, 271, 366(26A )

Mangalnath Developers v. UOI ; MANU/MH/1274/2020 ( Bom) (HC) www.itatonline .org

Customs Act ,1962

S. 129A :Appeal -Appellate Tribunal – Limitation – The period of
limitation of three months commences from the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is communicated and not from the date of decision of the Committee of Commissioners. [ S.128A ,129 ,General Clauses Act, 1897 S.3 (35) Rule 12 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 Art , 226 ]

Sunrise Associates v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2006) 5 SCC 603(SC)/AIR 2006 SC 1908/(2006) 145 STC 576 (SC)

. Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975
S. 4: Rates of tax- Lottery tickets –Right to participate in lottery is actionable claim – No sale of goods with in the meaning of the sales tax Act – Whether ratio of H. Anraj is still valid so far as it splits the rights attached to a lottery ticket into right to participate and right to win-former held as goods and latter as actionable claim-whether is a composite right [Constitution of India, Art. 246(3), 366(12), 366(29A) Sale of Goods Act, 1930,
S. 4(1), Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S. 3, 130]

Commissioner, DVAT v. ABB Ltd (2016) 6 SCC 791/AIR 2016 SC 1901/(2016) 55 GST 293 (SC)

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956
S. 3: When is sale or purchase of goods said Movement of goods in the course of import or inter-state or commerce – Deemed sale – when can be held to be covered by Section 3(a) and Section 5(2) of the CST Act, 1956 [S. 3(a), 5(2), Constitution of India, Art. 286(2), Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, S. 7, 74]

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. UOI (1997) 5 SCC 536/1997 (89) ELT 247 (SC)/(1998) 111 STC 467

Central Excise Act, 1944
S. 11B: Claim for refund of duty – Excise – Refund – Excise duty paid under mistake of law – Maintainability of suit or writ petition – Unjust enrichment – Salutary principle – to be held applicable [Constitution of India, Art. 265, Indian Contract Act, S. 72]

Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. CCE, Raipur (2019) 6 SCC 693

Central Excise Act, 1944
S. 11AB: Interest on delayed payment of duty – Interest on short levy or short payment – Escalation in price with retrospective date – Attracts interest on differential liability as per section 11AB of the Act

CCE v. ‘J’ Foundation and other (2015) 17 SCC 576/2015-TIOL-215-SC-CX/2015 (324) ELT 422 (SC)

Central Excise Act, 1944
S. 4: Valuation of excisable goods for purpose of charging of duty of excise – Valuation – Related person- Where the two companies/firms etc., belong to the same group then the test of mutuality is established and satisfied [S. 4(4)(c)]

D J Malpani v. CCCE Nashik (2019) 9 SCC 120/(2019) 74 GST 407/308 CTR 73 (SC)

Central Excise Act, 1944
S. 4: Valuation of excisable goods for purpose of charging of duty of excise – Valuation – Dharmada collected along with the price of goods – Not a part of transaction value

CCE v. Fiat India (P) Ltd. (2012) 37 STT 147/25 taxmann.com 534 (SC)/ 2012 (283) ELT 161 (SC)/(2012) 9 SCC 332

Central Excise Act, 1944
S. 4: Valuation of excisable goods for purpose of charging of duty of excise -Assessable value – Appellants selling cars on price lower than the cost of production main reason for assessees to sell their cars at a lower price than manufacturing cost was to penetrate market and this constituted extra commercial consideration – Since price charged was not sole consideration, hence, value was to be determined as per valuation rules