Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd (2023) 153 taxmann.com 641 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Delay of 213 days, SLP of Revenue is dismissed as the delay is not satisfactorily explained, CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 102 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Cash credits-Shell Companies-Information from Investigation Wing-Recorded reason mechanical manner without application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Mistake-A mistake, which can be corrected under section 292B, should be such that if excised it does not change tenor and scope of documents/proceedings referred to therein-Order of Tribunal quashing the reassessment order is affirmed-No substantial question of law.[S. 68, 143(1), 148, 260A, 292B]

PCIT v. Samsung India Electronics (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 21 (Delhi)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained expenditure-Prior period items and advertisement expenses-No new tangible material-Quashing of reassessment by the Tribunal is affirmed. [S.69C, 148, 260A]

Facets Gems Polishing Works (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 168 (Guj.)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Manufacturing and cut of polished diamond on job work basis and trading of diamonds and power generation through windmill-Amalgamation-No failure to disclose material facts-reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed and set aside. [S.80IA(4)(iv) 143(3), 148, Form No.10CCB, Art. 226]

Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel v. ITO (2023) 151 taxmann.com 121 (Guj)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, ITO v. Jagdish Kumar Vitthalbhai Patel (2024) 300 Taxman 96 (SC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 48, 148, Art. 226]

Rushil Decor Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 432 (Guj.)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Income from other sources-Interest income-Credit for Tax deducted at source-Change of opinion-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 56, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Adani Power Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 300 Taxman 484 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Depreciation-Foreign exchange fluctuations on imported machinery-Project development-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 32, 115JB, 148, Art. 226]

Toral Hemanshubhai Shah v. Asst. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 196 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Unexplained money-Information from the ADIT (Investigation)-Purchases and sale of commodities through National Multi-Commodities Exchange (NMCE platform)-Borrowed satisfaction-Not valid in the eyes of law-Non application of mind-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 69A, 148, Art. 226]

Darshana Anand Damle v.Dy.CIT (2023) 295 Taxman 240/ 459 ITR 60(Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, Dy. CIT v. Darshana Anand Damle (2024) 300 Taxman 108/469 ITR 27 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Development agreement-Capital gain tax-Granted a licence to developer-Issue was consideration before the Assessing Officer-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed.[S. 2(47)(v), 45, 148, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S.53A, Art. 226]

UOI v. Dhansri Roller Flour Mills (2024) 300 Taxman 106 (SC) Editorial : Dhansri Roller Flour Mills v. UOI (2023) 293 Taxman 716 /335 CTR 328 /(2024) 460 ITR 326 (Gauhati)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Special category states-Assessing Officer applied his mind-Proceeding to reopen assessment was actuated merely by a change of opinion and, hence, impugned notice was set aside-Time limit to issue of notice-Sanction obtained satisfaction of Additional Commissioner, an authority who is not covered by provision of section 151(1), as it stood on 1-1-2019, proceeding initiated against assessee-Issuance of notice under section 148 is held to be not in accordance with law-SLP of Revenue is dismissed on account of gross delay of 294 days. Revenue could not explain the delay satisfactorily.[S. 80IC, 148, 149, 151(1), Art.136]

CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 102 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Spirit Global Construction (P.) Ltd (2023) 153 taxmann.com 641 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Cash credits-Shell companies-Information from Investigation Wing-Recorded reason mechanical manner without application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Mistake-A mistake, which can be corrected under section 292B, should be such that if excised it does not change tenor and scope of documents/proceedings referred to therein-Order of Tribunal quashing the reassessment order is affirmed by the High Court as no substantial question of law-SLP of Revenue is dismissed as the delay of 213 days is not satisfactorily explained. [S. 68, 143(1), 148, 260A, 292B, Art. 136]