Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Marck Biosciences Ltd. (2019) 106 taxmann.com 399 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed as withdrawn due to low tax effect, PCIT v. Amantha Health Care Ltd (2020) 272 Taxman 35 (SC)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-non-issuance of notice under section 143(2) is not a procedural irregularity and same cannot be cured under section 292BB-Notice issued to prior to filing of return of income, said notice being invalid, assessment order passed in pursuance of same deserved to be set aside. [S. 143 (3), 292BB]

Kundan Care Product Ltd. v. Dy.DIT (Inv.) (2020) 113 taxmann.com 90 (All.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed, Dy. DIT v. Kundan Care Product Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 12 (SC)

S. 132 : Search and seizure-Stock in trade-Gold Dore Bars-Directed to be released after proper verification. [Art. 226]

PCIT v. J.P. Morgan Services India (P.) Ltd. (2020) 119 taxmann.com 413 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. JPMorgan Services India (P) Ltd (2020) 274 Taxman 281 (SC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Adjustment-MAP-ITAT is justified in in directing to adopt 16.63% Arm’s Length margin for transaction relating to non US entities based on MAP concluded with US Tax Authorities.

PCIT v. Cadence Design Systems (I) (P.) Ltd. (2020) 119 taxmann.com 415 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Cadence Design Systems (I) (P) Ltd. (2020) 274 Taxman 279 (SC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-company having high brand value cannot be selected as comparable.

PCIT v. UAE Exchange & Financial Service Ltd. (2020) 117 taxmann.com 105 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed as withdrawn due to low tax effect PCIT v. UAE Exchange Technology (P) Ltd (2020) 272 Taxman 19 (SC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Safe Harbour rules-RBI rate to be a bench mark-Second proviso to section 92C(2) which allows +/-5 per cent range to could be applied even in a case where transactions involved were an account of trading in foreign exchange.

PCIT v. Inductis (India) (P.) Ltd. (2020) 114 taxmann.com 319 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Inductis India (P) Ltd. (2020) 270 Taxman 1 (SC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Providing internet based medical health related services, a company rendering high end online software solutions, could not be accepted as comparable.

SBS Biotech Unit-I v. PCIT (2020) 114 taxmann.com 99 (Himachal Pradesh)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed PCIT v. SBS Biotech Unit-I (2020) 270 Taxman 173 (SC)

S. 80IC : Special category States-Substantial expansion-Entitle to deduction.

PCIT v. Yash Associates (2020) 115 taxmann.com 425 /423 ITR 215(Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Yash Associates ( 2019 ) 417 ITR 60 ( St) / (2020) 274 Taxman 103 (SC)

S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Undertaken development and construction of housing project on a piece of land which was different from land on which erstwhile promoters had completed construction of houses-Entitle to deduction.

PCIT v. Kewal Real Estate (P.) Ltd. (2020) 113 taxmann.com 623 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Kewal Real Estate (P.) Ltd. (2020) 270 Taxman 175 (SC)

S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Date of completion of construction
-Separate project-Separate approval was granted-Entitle to exemption.

CIT v. Global Estate (2020) 114 taxmann.com 95 (MP)(HC) Editorial : Operation of the High Court order is stayed Global Estate v. CIT (2020) 270 Taxman 178 (SC)

S. 80IB(10) : Housing projects-Completion certificate-Issuance of completion certificate after cut-off date by Local Authority but mentioning date of completion of certificate before cut-off date did not fulfil condition specified in clause (a) of section 80-IB(10) read with Explanation (ii)-Not entitle to deduction. (Order of High Court is stayed)