Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


UOI v. U.A.E. Exchange Centre (2020) 425 ITR 30/315 CTR 129/273 Taxman 122/ 190 DTR 79 (SC)

S. 5: Scope of total income – liaison office of the non-resident – A liaison office which is only carrying on such activity of a “preparatory or auxiliary” character is not a Permanent Establishment in terms of Article 5 of the Double taxation Avoidance Agreement – The deeming provisions in Sections 5 and 9 of the 1961 Act can have no bearing whatsoever- DTAA-India-UAE [S. 2(24) , 4 , 9(1)(i) ,90 , Art , 5 , 7 ]

CWT v. Estate of HMM Vikramsinhji of Gondal (2014) 363 ITR 679/225 Taxman 166/268 CTR 232/103 DTR 211 (SC)

S. 5: Scope of total Income – Accrual of income of discretionary trust – Income retained by the trustee cannot be brought tax in the assessment of beneficiary. [Wealth-tax Act, 1957, section 3]

Rampal Hooda v ITO ( 2020) BCAJ -April – 34 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

Interpretation of taxing statutes – Binding precedent – Two conflicting decision of different High Court – Transfer of case – Jurisdictional High Court decision will be binding on the Assessing Officer .

Rampal Hooda v ITO ( 2020) BCAJ -April – 34 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

Interpretation of taxing statutes – Binding precedent – Two conflicting decision of different High Court – Transfer of case – Jurisdictional High Court decision will be binding on the Assessing Officer .

C.S.Datamation Research Pvt Ltd v ITO ( 2020) BCAJ-July -P. 48 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Disallowance of service tax -Nether debited to profit and loss account nor claimed as expenditure – levy of penalty is held to be not justified [ S.43B ]

Jayantilal Voashnav HUF v .JCIT ( Mum) (Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 271E : Penalty – Repayment of loan or deposit – Reasonable cause – Levy of penalty is not valid [ S. 269T, 273B ]

Tata Power Company v. ACIT ( 2020) BCAJ – September – P. 42 ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record –Non -consideration of jurisdictional High Court , though not cited before the Tribunal at the time of hearing of appeal , constitute a mistake apparent on record – Gain derived form foreign currency bonds – Order recalled [ S. 4 , 28(i) ]

Procter & Gamble Hygine & Healthcare Ltd v .CIT ( 2020) BCAJ -May -2020 – P. 72 ( Bom) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Legal opinion – Delay of 458 in filing an appeal against an order under section 263 of the Act was condoned on payment of cost of Rs 25000 to the Maharashtra State legal Services . [ S. 253, 263 , 260A ]

Krez Hotel & Reality Ltd v . JCIT ( 2020) BCAJ -July- P. 46 ( Mum) (Trib)

S. 153C : Assessment – Income of any other person – Search – Assessment initiated without issue of notice is held to be bad in law [ S.132 ]

Paresh K .Shah v . DCIT ( Mum) (Trib) www.itatonlibe.org

S. 153C : Assessment – Income of any other person – Search – Additional ground – The date of receiving the books of account by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person, from the Assessing officer of the searched person- Satisfaction by the A.O in the file of the assessee i.e the person other than the searched person, shall be taken as the relevant date for reckoning the period of six assessment years for which assessments could have been framed u/s 153C. [ S.132 ]