Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Timblo (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 343 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Search-Diary-Unexplained general expenses-Legal expenses-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed-No substantial question of law.[S. 132, 153A, 260A]

ACIT v. Kantilal Exports Surat (2024) 300 Taxman 99 (SC) Editorial : ACIT v. Kantilal Exports Surat (2023) 293 Taxman 531/ 454 ITR 112 /332 CTR 610/ 225 DTR 357 (SC) M. Kantilal Exports v. ACIT (2011) 330 ITR 185 (Guj)(HC), reversed.

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Search and seizure-Duplicate account-Yield in various years-Finding reversed relying on statement-Order of Tribunal is restored-Miscellaneous application against the order of Supreme Court is dismissed on account of delay and also on merits. [S. 132, 143(3), Art. 136]

Basheera Begum v. Jt. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 160 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Failure to consider TDS challans-Matter is remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer-Directed to pay cost of Rs.15000 to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority.[S. 142(1), 143(3), 147, 148, Art. 226]

CIT v. Sachdeva & Sons (2024) 300 Taxman 211 (P&H)(HC)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Export of Rice-Search by Enforcement Directorate-Alleged mis-declaration of value of goods exported-Dropping of proceedings by Enforcement Directorate-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal is affirmed.[S. 148, 260A, FERA]

PCIT v. Simpex Granito (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 150 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Search-Purchase of raw material-Department and had only assumed undisclosed investment being source of purchases recorded for subsequent sales-Order of Tribunal had rightly deleted addition made by Assessing Officer under section 69C-No substantial question of law. [S.260A]

PCIT v. Sunil Mittal HUF (2024) 300 Taxman 288 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Bogus purchases-Purchase from grey market-Trading in gold and diamond jewellery-Sales accepted-Books of account not rejected-Order of Tribunal estimating addition of 13.05 per cent of gross profit is affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S. 145, 260A]

PCIT, Central v. Mukul Kakar (2024) 300 Taxman 618 (MP)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Established identity capacity and genuineness of Transactions-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-No substantial question of law.[S. 133(6), 260A]

Cornerstone Property Investments (P.) Ltd v. ITO (2023) 152 taxmann.com 256 (Karn)(HC) Editorial : Delay of 325 days, SLP of Revenue is dismissed, ITO v. Cornerstone Property Investments (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 85 (SC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share premium-Proved identity and creditworthiness of investor and genuineness of transactions-Order of Tribunal confirming the addition is set aside. [S. 143(1), 147,148, 260A]

ITO v. Cornerstone Property Investments (P.) Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 85 (SC) Editorial : Cornerstone Property Investments (P.) Ltd v. ITO (2023) 152 taxmann.com 256 (Karn)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share premium-Proved identity and creditworthiness of investor and genuineness of transactions-Order of Tribunal confirming the addition is set aside-Delay of 325 days-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 143(1), 147,148, Art. 136]

PCIT, Central v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. Ltd. (2024) 164 taxman.com 707 (Bom)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, PCIT, Central v. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 182 (SC)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Disallowance under substantive provision i.e. section 14A had been deleted-No adjustment can be made to book profit.[S. 14A, 260A, R.8D]