Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kiran Agrawal (Smt) v. ACIT (2023) 223 TTJ 626 (Raipur)(Trib)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Registration expenses for sale of land-Brokerage-Allowable as deduction-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification. [S. 45]

Chennai Properties & Investments Ltd v. ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 355 (Chennai )(Trib)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Property converted into stock in trade-Sale agreement entered into-General power of attorney-Sale is not registered-Sale is not complete on handing over of possession-Sale cannot be chargeable to capital gains tax. [S. 2(47)(v) 28(i), 153C, Transfer of Property Act,1882, S. 53A]

Dy. CIT v T. G. Chandrakumar (2023) 223 TTJ 469 / 152 taxmann. com 623 (Cochin )(Trib)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Search-Land dealings-Agreement for sale of land-Benamidar-Protective assessment-Executor of sale, and beneficiary of sale proceeds and other sellers were puppets controlled by assessee-Capital gains taxable in the hands of assessee. [S. 2(14), 2(47), 132,153C, 292C]

Euro Homes v. Dy. CIT(2023) TTJ 17 (UO) Trib)

S. 44AD :Presumptive basis-Incentive earned for achieving the sales target as per franchise agreement-Part of business turnover-Includible in turnover business-Not chargeable to tax under the head income from other sources-Reimbursement of expenses-Failure to file evidence-Income from house property-Not includible as gross receipts-Interest on fixed deposit-Income from other sources-Cannot be included in business receipts for estimating net profit under section. 44AD. [S. 22, 56, 194IB]

Infab Infrastucture (P) Ltd v. Dy. CIT(2023) 222 TTJ 421 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Tax paid before due date of filing of return though beyond stipulated time limit-Cannot be disallowed. [S. 139(1)]

Desimus Financilals Ltd v. ITO (2023) 223 TTJ 232 (SMC) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Certificate by Chartered Accountant-Recipient included the income in their assessment-Certificate in Form No 26A is furnished-Disallowance is deleted-Cannot be treated as an assessee in default. [S. 194A, 201(1)]

Dy. CIT v. Ultratech Transmission (P. ) Ltd. [2023] 221 TTJ 760/151 taxmann. com 20 (Ahd)(Trib. )

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Bogus sub-Contractor-10 percent disallowance is confirmed-Reassessment is affirmed. [S. 147, 148]

Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. Dy. CIT(2023) 223 TTJ 665 / 149 taxmann.com 207 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Donation to Red Cross Society and Japan relief Fund-Nature of gift cannot be allowed as deduction under section 37(1). [S. 80G]

Rajasthan Patrikha (P) Ltd v. ACIT(2023) 223 TTJ 715 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Expenditure on marketing survey-Statement was retracted-Cross examination is not provided-Allowable as deduction. [S. 133A]

Transafe International (P) Ltd v. Dy. CIT(2023) 223 TTJ 257 (Kol)(Trib)

S. 35 : Expenditure on scientific research-Accommodation entries-Survey-Office bearers of done society admitted that in the course of survey and also before Settlement Commission that they are providing accommodation entries by way of bogus donations in an organised manner-Not entitle to deduction-Notice issued under section 143(2) is valid-Reassessment is valid. [S. 35(1)(ii), 133A,143(2), 147, 148]