Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ACIT v. Merchant Agri Global P. Ltd. (2024)111 ITR 45 (Trib) (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Audit of accounts-Ad-hoc disallowance-Order of CIT(A) disallowing the ad-hoc disallowance is affirmed. [S.44AB]

Dy. CIT v. CBRE South Asia (P.) Ltd [2024] 163 taxmann.com 256 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employee Stock Option (ESOP)-Allowable as business expenditure.

Shine Star v. ACIT (Mum)(Trib) (UR)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bogus purchase-Rough diamonds-Estimate addition-Estimated the profit @ 3% of the polished diamonds and @5% of the rough diamonds. [S. 143(3)]

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. The DCIT(Ahd)(Trib)(UR)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-ROC filing fees paid for increase in share capital-Not allowable as revenue expenditure.

Raj Auto Wheels P Ltd v. ACIT (No.1) (2024) 111 ITR 199 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Prior period expense-Method of accounting-Not proved with necessary evidence-Commission-Lack of evidence-Disallowance is affirmed. [S. 145]

Pankaj Kumar Kasera v. ITO (2024) 112 ITR 1 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Ad-hoc basis-Books of account not rejected-Disallowance of expenses and purchase differences-Revenue stamps not affixed-Books of accounts audited-Purchase differences reconciled with suppliers-Ad hoc disallowance not sustainable.[S. 133(6), 145]

Gujarat Infrapipes P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)111 ITR 47 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)

S. 36(1)(iii) :Interest on borrowed capital-Work-in-progress-Out of own funds and borrowed funds-Disallowance is deleted.

ITO v. Jamna Auto Industries; (2024) 111 ITR 569 /229 TTJ 209/239 DTR 57 (Chd)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Consistent methodology Interest-free advance given to an individual for the purpose of business was held to be genuine and allowable.

Micropoint Computers P. Ltd. v.Dy. CIT (2024)111 ITR 89 (SN)/232 TTJ 1049 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 36(1)(ii):Bonus or commission-Directors had declared salary and bonus-Entitled to claim deduction in respect of payment of bonus to its directors.

Gujarat Infrapipes P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)111 ITR 47 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Rate of depreciation-Computer software-Depreciation allowable at 60 Per Cent.