Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Poonjar Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 206 DTR 425 / 323 CTR 104 (Ker.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge in Poonjar Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. ITO (2021) 206 DTR 428 / 323 CTR 107 (Ker) (HC), set aside.

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Co-operative societies-Denial of exemption-Binding precedent-Failure to follow the judgement of Supreme Court-Alternative remedy-Judgement of single judge was set aside-The Assessing Officer was directed to redo the assessment after hearing the parties. [S. 80P(2)(a)(i), Art. 226]

One Mobikwik Systems (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 204 DTR 87 / 321 CTR 711 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Validity-Natural justice-Cash credits-Foreign in ward remittances-E-filing portal was dysfunctional-Order set aside. [S. 68, 115BBE, 143(2), 156, Art. 226]

CIT v. I. Mahabaleshwarappa (2021) 204 DTR 194 / 321 CTR 746 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Validity-Order passed after death-After conclusion of submission before passing of order the assessee expired-Order of Tribunal quashing of the order was set aside-The Assessing Officer was directed to issue notice to the legal representatives of the deceased and thereafter pass afresh order of assessment. [S. 159(2)]

Shiva Cement Ltd. v. DIT (Inv.) ( 2021 ) 439 ITR 92 / 207 DTR 1 /323 CTR 1 ( 2022 ) 284 Taxman 306 (Orissa)(HC) Shivom Minerals Ltd. v. DIT (Inv.) ( 2021 ) 439 ITR 92 / 207 DTR 1 /323 CTR 1 ( 2022 ) 284 Taxman 306 ( 2021 ) 439 ITR 92 / 207 DTR 1 /323 CTR 1 ( 2022 ) 284 Taxman 306 (Orissa)(HC).Editorial : SLP of assessee dismissed , Shivom Minerals Ltd v . DIT (Inv) ( 2022) 443 ITR 362 (St) (SC)

S. 132 : Search and seizure-Validity-Authorisation-Reason to believe-Non filing of return-Department can conduct survey at one place and Search at another place-Issue of summons is not mandatory-Search action is held to be valid. [S. 132(1)(c), 132(4), 133A, 153A, 292CC, Art. 226]

Bonfiglioli Transmission (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 203 DTR 329 / 321 CTR 726/(2023) 451 ITR 501 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Computation-TNMM-Alternative remedy-Writ to quash the assessment order-Writ is held to be not maintainable. [S. 92CA, Art. 226 ]

PCIT v. HIS Automative Ltd. [2020] 119 taxmann.com 445 / (2021) 205 DTR 242 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Scientific expenditure paid to research association-Condition not satisfied-Alternative claim-Allowable as business expenditure. [S. 35 (1)]

Rishab Steel House v. ACIT ( 2021 ) 206 DTR 205/ 322 CTR 857/ ( 2022) 440 ITR 223 ( Bom) (HC )

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020

S. 3: Amount payable by declarant – Filing of declaration and particulars to be furnished – Appeal of assessee and department appeal – Option is with the declarant to decide which matter to be settled -Clarification issued by the CBDT is binding on the department – The Department was directed to accept the declaration filed by the assessee only in respect of appeal of assessee [ S. 4, Art , 226 ]

Mantelone Investment Ltd v. CIT ( 2021 ) 323 CTR 129/ 207 DTR 79/ ( 2022) 440 ITR 111 ( Bom) (HC).

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020

S. 2(1)(j):Disputed tax – Tax arrear- Amount payable by the assessee could not be increased by withdrawing interest already granted under section 244A of the Act . [ S. 2(1)(o), 3, 7, Income -tax , S. 244A , Art , 226 ]

Shwetal Rittulbbhai Vora v .PCIT ( 2021 ) 323 CTR 243/ 207 DTR 369 //(2022)441 ITR 669 ( Guj) (HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020

S. 2(1)(a)(ii): Appellant – Period of limitation for filing an appeal before the High Court was not over – Period of limitation for filing appeal would start from date of receipt of certified copy as per section 260A (2)(a)- Rejection of declaration was held to be not valid – [ Income -tax Act ,S. 260A(2)(a) , Art , 226 ]

Karan Ventakeshwara Associates v. ITO ( 2021 ) 204 DTR 310/ 322 CTR 148 ( Bom) (HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020

S. 2(1)(a)(i): Appellant – Pendency of appeal – Condonation of delay – Order of condonation of delay relates back to the filing of an appeal – Rejection of application was held to be not valid [ S.3, 9 , Art , 226 ]