Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Blue Heaven Griha Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 441 ITR 621 /285 Taxman 663 / 211 DTR 376 / 326 CTR 74 (Cal.)(HC) PCIT v. Wellgrowth Grihanirman Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 441 ITR 621 / 285 Taxman 663 / 211 DTR 376 / 326 CTR 74 (Cal.) (HC) PCIT v. Orchid Griah Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 441 ITR 621 / 285 Taxman 368 / 211 DTR 376 / 326 CTR 74 (Cal.) (HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Blue Heaven Griha Nirman (P.) Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 11 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Revaluation of asset of firm-Transfer of revalued reserve to partners’ accounts-Section 45(3) is applicable in year of transfer of capital asset by partner to firm by way of capital contribution-Re valuation is not colourable device-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 10(2A) 45(3) 148, 260A]

Pardesi Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. NAFAC (2022) 441 ITR 696 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Issue of notice and draft assessment prior to final assessment order-Violation of principle of natural justice-Order set aside. [S. 143(3), 270A]

Vellaian Selvaraj v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 644/ 213 DTR 309 / 326 CTR 550 (Mad.)(HC) Kumaravel Muthiah Mallika v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 644 / 213 DTR 309 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Merely reproducing content of assessees replies to notices is not sufficient-Matter remanded for passing order. [Art. 226]

Idex India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 616 / 285 Taxman 400 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Draft assessment order-Final notice with draft assessment order not served-Assessment order not valid. [S. 144B(1)(xvi), 144B(xxii), Art. 226]

Gandhi Realty (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 316 / 214 DTR 283 (Guj.) (HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Draft assessment order-Violation of principle of natural justice-Failure to issue notice-Order not valid [S.143(3), 144(2), Art. 226]

Darshan Enterprise v. ACIT (2022) 441 ITR 473 / 209 DTR 417 / 324 CTR 469 / 286 Taxman 75 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Procedure prescribed not followed-Cash credits-Firm-Partner-Source of the investors of capital and amount received need not be established-Matter remanded. [S.68,69, 143 (3), 144B(9), Art. 226]

Gangadhar Jena v. PCIT (2022) 441 ITR 642 / 209 DTR 353 / 324 CTR 376 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Discrepancy in dates of actual hearing and dates of service of notices mentioned in assessment order-Not granted an effective opportunity of hearing-Assessment order and consequential penalty notices set aside-Matter remanded. [S. 263, 271(1)(c), Art. 226]

Amjathkhan Sharmila Siraj (Mrs.) v. ITO (2022) 441 ITR 1 / 210 DTR 1//325 CTR 330 / 145 taxmann.com 227 (Mad.) (HC) Arunachalam Nadar Muthuraj v. ITO (2022) 441 ITR 107 / 285 Taxman 415 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Alternative remedy-Adequate opportunities of hearing given were not availed-Writ is not maintainable when there is an efficacious statutory remedy of appeal before CIT(A). [S. 143(2), 246A, Art. 226]

Deep Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)441 ITR 307 / 212 DTR 307 / 326 CTR 107 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Revised return-Demerger-Delay in filing revised return-Demerger-Protective assessment-Sanction from Company law Board-Rejection of revised return is not valid. [S 139(5), Art. 226]

Jayeshkumar and Co. v. UOI (2022) 441 ITR 592 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Seizer of cash-Direction issued to return seized cash in accordance with assessment order. [S. 132B(3), Art. 226]