Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ACIT v. Ashish Indur Chowdhry (2021) 190 ITD 435 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Advance against sale of property-Continued to remained as liability in the balance sheet-Addition cannot be made as cessation of liability.

Mohammed Ali Shaik v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 771 /(2022) 211 DTR 94 / 216 TTJ 94 (Vishakha)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Real estate developer-Purchase of agricultural land-Disallowance was held to be not justified. [R. 6DD(e)(i)]

Oceanic Bio Harvest Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 190 ITD 765 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Pond and farm maintenance expenses-No evidence was produced to prove that the payments had been made to cultivator, grower or produced-Disallowance was confirmed. [R. 6DD(e)]

Universal Stone Crushing Co. Dala v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 415 (SMC) (All.)(Trib.)

S. 40(b)(iv) : Amounts not deductible-Partner-Interest-Pro-rata basis-Average opening and closing balance. [S. 36(1)(iii), 37(1)]

Metropolis Healthcare Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 190 ITD 331 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-Education cess-Allowable as deduction [S.37 (1)]

UHDE India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 190 ITD 777/ 211 TTJ 339 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax- Education cess and, higher and secondary education cess is not tax-Allowable as deduction. [S. 37 (1)]

Metropolis Healthcare Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 190 ITD 331 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Dividend distribution tax-Not allowable as deduction.

Universal Stone Crushing Co. Dala v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 415 (SMC) (All.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Telephone expenditure-Disallowance for alleged use by partners was deleted.

Universal Stone Crushing Co. Dala. v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 415 (SMC) (All.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Plant repair and maintenance expenses-Failure to produce supporting documents-5% of disallowance was held to be proper.

Sogefi Engine Systems India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 190 ITD 525 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-R&D expenditure-Automobile industry-Claimed 70 percent as capital and 30 percent as revenue-No matching concept-Held to be capital in nature-Entitle for depreciation. [S. 32]