S. 7 : Valuation of asset-Asset sold 28 days after valuation date-Value determined at guideline value on date of sale is not proper-Valuation to be at market value on valuation date-Dispute as to extent of landholding-Matter remanded. [S. 7(1),
S. 7 : Valuation of asset-Asset sold 28 days after valuation date-Value determined at guideline value on date of sale is not proper-Valuation to be at market value on valuation date-Dispute as to extent of landholding-Matter remanded. [S. 7(1),
S. 5(i): Exemption-Asset-Urban land-Property held under trust-Land leased to educational institution-Building constructed-Lands cannot be held to be vacant lands-Not liable to wealth-tax. [S. 2(ea)(v), IT Act, S. 11, 13(1)(c)]
S. 2(e)(a) : Assets-Vacant Urban land-Not vacant land-Existing building was demolished-Semi finished building-Matter remanded for re verification.
S. 272A : Penalty-Failure to answer questions-Sign statements-Furnish information-Delay in filing return-Hospitalization of managing trustee-Reasonable cause-Assessing Officer is directed to delete the penalty. [S. 12AA, 139, 272(2)(e), 273B]
S. 271G : Penalty-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Diamond business-Maintaining primary books of account and documents-Transactions accepted to be at Arm’s Length-Failure by Transfer Pricing Officer to determine Arm’s Length Price independently by applying one of prescribed methods-Deletion of penalty is justified.
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Ad hoc disallowance-Penalty is not sustainable.
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Ad hoc disallowance-Penalty is not sustainable.
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Denial of exemption u/s 11-High Court admitted the appeal-Not specifying the specific limb of section 271(1)(c)-Penalty not leviable. [S. 11. 13, 260A]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Show cause notice and discussion restricted too share application money-Reassessment order not erroneous and prejudicial to revenue-Revision order was quashed. [S. 68, 147, 148]
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Reassessment-Revision notice a verbatim copy of reasons recorded by Assessing Officer for reopening assessment-Assessing Officer Accepting returned income after verifying explanation-Revision by PCIT not sustainable. [S. 143(3), 147]