Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sofitra Impex P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)107 ITR 52 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Ignorance of law and bona fides-Non-Resident directors not material-Not mere technical violation in case of companies-Levy of penalty Justified. [S.269SS, 269T, 271E]

Jyoti Paper Udyog Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2023)107 ITR 16 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S. 271AA : Penalty-Failure to keep and maintain books of accounts-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Non-compliance of provisions occurred due to opinion given by Chartered Accountant-Reasonable cause-Penalty unsustainable.[S.40A(2)(b), 92D, 92E, 273B]

Heidelberg Cement India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 49 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Additional depreciation-Claim not sustained by authorities-Penalty is not leviable.[S. 32]

Pradip Burman v.Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 59 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Prosecution on same facts quashed-No ground for levy of penalty. [S. 276C(1), 276D, 277]

Kavita Jasjit Singh v. CIT (2023)107 ITR 1 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)

S. 270A : Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Income tax refund-Offered in the course of assessment-Non-declaration of interest cannot be said to be under-reporting of Income. [S. 143(3), 274]

Greenwoods Government Officers Welfare Society v. Dy. CIT (2023) 107 ITR 81 (SN)/226 TTJ 928 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 270A : Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Notice not mentioning under which limb of section notice issued-Proceedings unsustainable. [S.270A(9)]

D. C. Polyester Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 77 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)

S. 270A : Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Change of head of income-Rental income-Explanation is not found to be false-Penalty is deleted.[S. 22, 23,24(a), 270A(6)]

Polygel Industries P. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)107 ITR 62 (SN.)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Book profit-Stepdown subsidiaries and associate companies-Revision order is set aside. [S. 36(1)(vii),43B 115JB]

KKR India Advisors P. Ltd. v. CIT (2023)107 ITR 4 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limitation-Reference to Transfer Pricing Officer-Pursuant to order of Transfer Pricing Officer, Assessment Order Passed without Making any transfer pricing adjustments-Time-limit for passing order barred by limitation-Assessee given liberty to make application for recall of order if found later that Assessing Officer had passed assessment order considering direction of Principal Commissioner within time-limit allowed.[S.92CA(3) 143(3), 153]

Vijay Kumar Singla v. PCIT (2023)107 ITR 213 (Amritsar) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash credits-Assessing Officer accepting genuineness of cash deposits-Revision on account of difference in opinion-Revision is invalid.[S. 68]