Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Pravinchandra R. Patel v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.) Ansuben P.Patel (Smt) v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.) Neothech Education Foundation v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Information in Annual Information return is not incriminating material-Addition is deleted.[S. 5, 50C, 132]

Asst. CIT v. Vibhu International Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 6 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Factum of amalgamation intimated to Assessing Officer with request to cancel Permanent Account Number of amalgamating company-Notice in name of non-existent entity-Not sustainable.[S. 147]

Cricket South Africa (NPC) v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2023)107 ITR 93 (SN)/226 TTJ 936 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded-Factual misstatements and inaccuracies-Sanction of commissioner without proper application of mind-Dispute Resolution Panel-Admitting errors-Reassessment is bad in law.[S.144C, 148, 151]

Asst. CIT v. Pradip Overseas Ltd. (2023)107 ITR 60 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Settlement Of Case-Settlement Commission passing order settling case-Binding on department-Assessing Officer has no power to reopen assessment for year forming part of Settlement-Recovery of tax-Companies-Insolvency resolution-Resolution plan as approved by committee of creditors approved by National Company Law Tribunal-Binding on all Parties-Dues not forming part of resolution plan stand extinguished-Department has no power to reopen assessment [S.148, 245C(1), 245D(4)]

Bharti Singh (Smt.) v. Asst. CIT (2023)107 ITR 26 (SN)(Amritsar) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded-No addition is made on the basis of recorded reasons-Addition is made on other grounds which are not part of the recorded reasons-Reassessment is quashed.[S. 148]

Evershine Recreation P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 65 (SN)(Chd) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Borrowed satisfaction-Contrary to facts-All information was available while passing the original assessment order-Approval without application of mind-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 132, 133A, 148, 151, 153A, 153C]

Evershine Recreation P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 65 (SN) (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Borrowed satisfaction-Reassessment is not valid-Approval is not valid [S. 132, 133A,148, 151, 153A, 153C]

Dilipkumar Jashbai Patel v. Asst. CIT (IT) (2023)107 ITR 79 (SN) (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment-Limitation-Draft assessment order-Objections a day late-And Dispute Resolution Panel dismissing objections as filed late-Assessing Officer is bound to complete assessment within a month from last date for filing objections-Order passed beyond that date ultra vires.[S.143(3)]

Rahil Marketing P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 48 (SN) (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation-Intimation to Department with the copy of order approving merger-Order passed in name of non-existent entity void and set aside.

Economical Credit and Construction Co. P. Ltd. v. ITO (2023)107 ITR 51 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Entries in the books of account-Sale of land-Entries in books is not conclusive-Right income should be taxed in right hands, under right head of income in right year of assessment-Addition as undisclosed income is deleted. [S. 4, 69, 133(6), 145]