Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Pravinchandra R. Patel v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib) Ansuben P.Patel (Smt) v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 34 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Unaccounted expenditure and receipts-Only profit element in unaccounted business receipts and net result of unaccounted receipts and expenditure could be brought to tax-Assessment made substantively in hands of company-Protective addition in hands of director is deleted-Certificate from Gram Panchayat secondary evidence-Primary Evidence of crops, income and expenses unavailable-Fifty Per Cent. treated as agricultural income-Balance treated as income from other sources-Cash available in hands of group-Set off to be permitted-If sufficient cash available after set off and adjustments-No addition is permissible-Depreciation-Value of addition to block-Addition of differential depreciation is deleted. [S. 5, 10(1), 32 56, 69]

Sandeep Sethi v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 311 /223 TTJ 294 / 226 DTR 148 (Jaipur) (Trib) Rajiv Nigotiya v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 311 /223 TTJ 294 / 226 DTR 148 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Search-Income from undisclosed sources-Jewellery discovered in search-Assessing Officer cannot make separate addition over and above excess identified in search-Rate of tax-Penalties-Levy of tax under section 115BBE not in accordance with law. [S. 5, 69, 115BBE, 132, 132(4), 271AABB, 271AAC]

Foseco International Ltd. v. CIT (Appeals) (2023)107 ITR 222 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Powers-Tribunal remanding matter to Assessing Officer to consider whether certain receipts constitute fees for technical services-Assessing Officer treating receipts as royalty-Beyond scope of remand-Reimbursement of expenses for use of software-Not fees for technical service-DTAA-India-USA [S. S. 9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), art. 13(4)]

P. P. Telecell Marketing P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 401 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Employees contribution to Provident fund and Employees’ State Insurance-Matter restored to Assessing Officer for verification-If Employees contribution had been remitted within due date from end of month in which salary disbursed entitled to relief. [S.143(1)(iv)]

Milind Moreshwar Pimpalkhare v. Dy. DIT (2023)107 ITR 73 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S. 139 : Return of income-Foreign tax credit-Assessment-Benefit of tax paid in Kazakhstan is directed to be allowed.[S.139(4) 143993) Rule, 128(9), Form No 67]

ITO v. Riddhi Siddhi Jewellers (2023)107 ITR 662 (Rajkot)(Trib)

S. 133A : Power of survey-Surrender of income-Unexplained money-Unexplained expenditure-Excess stocks-Excess stock chargeable to tax as business Income-Deduction of partners’ remuneration allowable against income surrendered.[S. 40(b), 69A,69C.]

Booking.Com India Support and Marketing Services P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)107 ITR 17 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Employees’ Stock Option Plan Expenses-Purpose of granting employees restricted stock units to retain and motivate them to continue employment with assessee-Arm’s length price of employees stock option plan expenses could not be taken as nil-Arm’s length price and transfer pricing adjustment, if any, to be recomputed following method adopted by assessee.

Swiss Re Global Business Solutions India P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)107 ITR 381 (Bang) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Back-Office services-Comparables-Companies functionally different from assessee being routine back-office service provider is to be excluded-Company earning profit in any one of three years can be treated as comparable-Matter remanded for verification of financial statements-Transfer Pricing Officer is bound to follow directions in letter and spirit-Deferred receivables-Interest rate in terms of Libor Plus a mark-up of two hundred basis points to be considered.[S.92CA]

Quest Global Engineering Services P. Ltd. v.ACIT (2023)107 ITR 546 (Bang) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Calculation of margins-Allocation of employee cost-Not proper-Selection of comparables-Turnover filter-Companies failing turnover filter up to Rs. 200 Crores to be excluded–Working capital adjustment mandatory requirement if assessee is able to provide reasonable and accurate data of comparable companies-Interest on delayed receivables to be benchmarked separately-Directed for adjustment afresh after applying six months’ Libor plus 300 basis points with mark-up of 100 basis points. [S.92CA]

Ness Digital Engineering (India) P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)107 ITR 584 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Reimbursing of expenses-No element of profit-Ad hoc adjustment recommended at 10 Per Cent. of expenses is not permissible-Late deposits of employees’ contribution to provident fund and employees’ State Insurance Corporation is not allowable. [S. 37(1), R.10B]