Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Van Oord Dredging and Marine Contractors BV v. ACIT (2024) 206 ITD 632 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fee for technical services-Management service-Support services-Not royalty-DTAA-India-Netherland. [S.9(1)(vii), Art. 12 (4)]

International Education & Research Foundation v. DCIT (IT) 2024] 206 ITD 96 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees for technical services-Educational school-Lump sum fees-Discounts-Deduction of tax at source-Matter is remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer-DTAA-India-Switzerland-UK. [S.9(1)(vii), 195, Art. 12, 13]

Sanjay Kumar. v. ACIT (IT) (2024) 206 ITD 14 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(ii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Salaries-Income from employment-Others-Non-resident for services rendered outside India-Assessee neither had any rest period nor leave period which was preceded and succeeded by services rendered outside India-Salary received by assessee from outside India could not be taxed in India-DTAA-India-UAE-Ireland. [S.5, 15]

Jiangdong Fittings Equipments Co. Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 206 ITD 344 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Business profits-Offshore supplies-Fees for technical services-Supply of goods and equipments was completed outside India-Transfer of title over goods had passed from non-resident assessee to Indian PSU’s outside India-Receipts from such supply could not be made taxable in India-DTAA-India-China. [S.9(1)(vii), Art. 7]

Somnath Duttagupta v. ACIT (2024) 111 ITR 385 / 206 ITD 317 /229 TTJ 84 (Kol) (Trib.)

S. 6(1) : Residence in India-Individual-Income from employment-Salary payments outside India-Exercised employment and received remuneration in US-Salary income is taxable in USA and not in India-India-USA [S. 9(1)(i),90(4) Art.4, 16]

DCIT v. BTW Atlanta Transformers India (P.) Ltd. (2024) 206 ITD 670 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest on fixed deposit – Not commenced its business – Interest income earned on fixed deposits pertaining to period prior to commencement of business was in nature of capital receipt. [S. 28(i), 35D]

Unique Trading Company v. ITO (2024)467 ITR 682 /298 Taxman 176 / 340 CTR 178 / 238 DTR 81(Bom)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Failure to pay tax-Firm-Death of managing partnerer-Surviving partners unaware of tax dues-Self Assessment-Tax dues along with interest paid within five days of receipt of notice-No mala fide intention to evade tax-Mere failure to pay tax on time cannot be equated to wilful attempt to evade tax-Criminal prosecution quashed and set aside. [S. 276C(1), 276(2), 278B, Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 482]

SSA International Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2024)467 ITR 183 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 271AAA : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007-Manner of deriving surrendered income-Failure to satisfy conditions-Order of Tribunal confirming levy of penalty is not erroneous. [S. 132(4), 260A]

CIT (E) v. Niit Foundation (2024)467 ITR 63 / 64 taxmann.com 628 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Educational Institution-Charitable purpose-Subsidised fee collected and corporate donations utilized solely for purposes of educational activities-Surplus funds utilised for educational purposes-Activities fell within definition of S.2(15)-Imparting of education through Virtual Mode-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision is affirmed-The question with respect to whether the Commissioner (E) was justified in invoking its powers conferred by section 263 was insignificant hence not answered. [S. 2(15), 11, 12A,13(1)(c), 80G(5), 143(3), 260A]

PCIT v. HTL LTD. (2024)467 ITR 573/300 Taxman 598 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. H.T.L Ltd. (2023) 294 Taxman 38/ (2024) 467 ITR 163 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Land was sold by secured creditors-Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 45, 50C, 143(1), The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act), Art. 136]