Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)114 ITR 502 (Mum)(Trib)

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment-Statutory dues-Write-Back from taxable income-Provision offered to tax in earlier year and written back in subsequent year not taxable-Matter remanded for verification.

Bando (India) P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)114 ITR 275 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 43A : Rate of exchange-Foreign currency-Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-External commercial borrowing loans-Loss on reinstatement of external commercial borrowing-Mere reinstatement of losses per Accounting Standards without actual payment or remittance-Addition cannot be made-Additional ground is admitted. [S.37(1), 254(1)]

Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)114 ITR 434 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 40A(2): Expenses or payments not deductible-Excessive or unreasonable-Payment to related parties-Deletion is justified. [S.40A(2)(b)]

Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)114 ITR 502 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 40A(2): Expenses or payments not deductible-Excessive or unreasonable-Service charges paid to group company-Common management services-Disallowance is deleted.

Punj Lloyd Alcon Lk Goyal (JV) v. ITO (2024)114 ITR 36 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Mobilisation advance-Joint venture-Issue restored to Assessing Officer for verification.

ACIT v. First Advantage P. Ltd. (2024)114 ITR 45 (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Payments to contractors and professional or technical service fee-Deducted lower rate of tax-Disallowance is not justified.[S.194C, 194J]

Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 114 ITR 546 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Commission-Disallowance is deleted.

Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (2024)114 ITR 434 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Commission expense-Additional ground not considered-Matter remanded for de novo consideration. [S. 254(1)]

Malbros Holdings P. Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 114 ITR 25 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Amortisation of expenditure-Roc fees for share application money amortised over five years-Allowable as deduction.

Global Tech India P. Ltd. v. ITO (2024)114 ITR 59 (SN)(Ahd)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Product development expenses-Project dropped and expenses written off-No new software in existence and no enduring benefit-Allowable as revenue expenditure.