Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ganpati International v. PCIT (2023)105 ITR 266(Chd) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Loans-Creditors-Opinion of internal audit machinery not binding on him-Revision is quashed. [S. 143(3)]

Angelica Properties P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)105 ITR 442 (Pune) (Trib) Vason Engineers Ltd v. Add. CIT (2023)105 ITR 442 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Power to enhance income-Capital gains as business income-Failure to issue show cause before enhancement-Enhancement is not valid-Treatment of lease rent as business income is not sustainable. [S. 28(i), 45, 251 (2)]

FIL India Business And Research Services P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)105 ITR 82 / 154 taxmann.com 251 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Offered to tax in year of receipt-Could not be taxed in year of accrual. [S. 5]

Asst. CIT v. Dr. D. Y. Patil Education Society (2023)105 ITR 400 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Educational Institution-Unaccounted capitation fees-Statements of persons relied upon who are not holding any important post or having any authority in College or Trust Students denied making payment of capitation fees-Assessment has to be made based on evidence and not on suspicion and conjectures-Order of CIT(A) deleting the addition is affirmed.[S.69C, 132]

Dy. CIT v. Bakshiram Uderam Holdings P. Ltd 2023)105 ITR 220 (Kol)(Trib) Dy.CIT v. Narsingh Ispat Ltd. (2023)105 ITR 220 (Kol)(Trib) Dy.CIT v. Narsingh Ispat Udyog P. Ltd. (2023)105 ITR 220 (Kol)(Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Cash credits-Return processed under section 143(1)-Share application money-Information available before the date of search-No incriminating material-Assessment is bad in law-Statement recorded by Investigation Agencies-Opportunity of cross examination. is not given-Assessments not sustainable-Share application moneys-Merger-Amalgamation-No inquiry could be made in hands of assessees Qua antecedents of merged companies-Additions are not sustainable. [S. 68, 143(1), 143(2)]

Aurum Platz P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)105 ITR 615 / 225 TTJ 771 / 152 taxmann.com 85 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Original assessments completed prior to date of search-No incriminating material is found-Assessment is bad in law.[S.36(1)(iii), 143(3)]

Dy. CIT v. Heaven Associates (2023)105 ITR 186/ 154 taxmann.com 595 154 taxmann.com 595 (Ahd) (Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Statements of key person and documents found during search-Not constituting incriminating material-Additions made on presumptions and conjectures-Deleted-Undisclosed source-Estimation of profit-Unrecorded sales-No infirmity in books of account-Addition on account of.

Angelica Properties P. Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2023)105 ITR 442 (Pune) (Trib) Vason Engineers Ltd v. Add. CIT (2023)105 ITR 442 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Percentage completion method-Matter remanded.

Mahalasa Exports v.ITO (2023)105 ITR 69 (SN)(Bang) (Trib)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Mercantile system of accounting-Customs duty drawback-Refund-Income-Accrual-Accrues when assessee gets right to receive it-When it is sanctioned to assessee by Customs Authorities-Not in year when assessee makes claim. [S. 4, 5, 37(1).]

Bilcare Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)105 ITR 94/ 147 taxmann.com 101 147 taxmann.com 101 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Business expenditure-Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Capacity Utilisation Adjustment-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S.92C]