Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Virendra Kumar Chourasia v. ITO (2023)458 ITR 431 (MP)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Reply to initial notice-Assessing Officer directed to proceed after considering reply of assessee. [S. 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 226]

Satluj Credit And Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 458 ITR 378 / 152 taxmann.com 401 (Mad)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Initial notice need only state issue on basis of which reopening of assessment is proposed-Writ petition is dismissed. [S.2(22)(e), 147 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Nitin Nema v. PCIT (2023)458 ITR 690 /155 taxmann.com 276/ 334 CTR 545 (MP)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice after three years-Failure to file the return of income-Gross receipt of sale consideration not income chargeable to tax-Notice and consequential orders are quashed.[S. 2(24), 147, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Midland Microfin Ltd. v. UOI(2023)458 ITR 36 (P&H)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Followed statutory procedure-Alternative remedy-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

ARB Hotels Resorts Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)458 ITR 61/(2024) 296 Taxman 419 (All)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Reason to believe is sufficient-Not necessary to prove actual escapement of income-Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

RRJ Infra Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023)458 ITR 573 / 331 CTR 671/ 224 DTR 418/150 taxmann.com 85 (All)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Company ceased to exist-Authorities are aware of amalgamation-Notice is held to be not valid. [S. 147, Art. 226]

Sanjay Kumar v. ACIT (2023)458 ITR 548 /151 taxmann.com 158 / 334 CTR 500(Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Transaction has not taken place in previous year-Objection is not considered-Sanction is without application of mind-Notice and order disposing the application is quashed.[S. 133(6), 148, 151, Art. 226]

Limbabhai Ishwarbhai Jodhani v. ACIT (2023)458 ITR 331/150 taxmann.com 291 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Audit objection and factual errors-Capital gains-Agricultural land-Notice is bad in law-Notice and order is quashed. [S. 45, 50C, 148, Art. 226]

Gandhibag Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 458 ITR 157 /156 taxmann.com 221 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Borrowed satisfaction-change of opinion-Notice without jurisdiction-Notice and order disposing the objection is quashed-Writ can be entertained on judicial aspect. [S. 2(40) 142(1), 143(2), 148, Art. 226]

Jetair Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023)458 ITR 462 / 148 taxmann.com 185 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No evidence of failure to disclose material facts-Notice not specifying which facts not disclosed-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is quashed. [S. 143(3), 148, Art. 226]