Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Hede Ferrominas (P.) Ltd v. ACIT [2023] 147 taxmann.com 215 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Unexplained moneys-No return of income filed-Where an assessee failed to file its return of income and did not respond in time to a notice under section 148, the Assessing Officer was justified in forming a reason to believe that income, in the form of certain receipts, had escaped assessment. [S. 139, 148, Art. 226]

Sri Shanmukhananda Fine Arts and Sangeetha Sabha v. DDIT (E) [2023] 157 taxmann.com 737 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Charitable trust-No failure to disclose fully and truly material facts-Where an assessment was framed under section 143(3), a notice for reopening issued after four years is not valid if the reason to believe is based on information disclosed in the return of income, as it does not constitute a failure to disclose material facts. [S. 11, 12AA, 143(3), 148, Art 226]

Kapstone Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 153 taxmann.com 305 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion –Unabsorbed depreciation-Notice based on perusal of records already examined in scrutiny assessment-Invalid without failure to disclose material facts. [S. 32(2), 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Nirjay Securities (P.) Ltd v. ITO [2023] 157 taxmann.com 53 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of hearing-Assessment order passed after providing only three working days to respond to draft order and denying personal hearing is violative of principles of natural justice; matter to be remanded for fresh adjudication. [S. 133(6), 142(1), 144C, Art. 226]

Shri Venkatesh Refineries Ltd. v. DCIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 289 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of hearing-Adjournment request-Portal closed without communication-Where department, without either accepting or rejecting assessee’s timely adjournment request, closed submission portal, thereby preventing it from filing its reply, subsequent assessment order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and was liable to be quashed. [S. 143(2), 144B(1)(xiii), Art. 226]

CS & Sons v. NFAC [2023] 153 taxmann.com 177 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of hearing-Inadequate time to respond to show-cause notice a violation of principles of natural justice-Assessment order set aside and matter remanded.[S. 143(3), Art. 226]

PCIT v. Dhondiram Naryan Limbhore [2023] 153 taxmann.com 539 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, PCIT v. Zahira R. Khatun. (2025) 304 Taxman 514 (SC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Where corresponding sales are accepted, addition is to be limited to estimated gross profit. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. M. Dinshaw and Co. (P) Ltd [2023] 156 taxmann.com 170 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 69A : Unexplained moneys-Accommodation bills-Bogus purchases-Onus of proof-Disallowance of expenditure is unsustainable where assessee discharges onus by furnishing substantial evidence to prove genuineness of transaction-Assessee is not required to produce third-party books of account. [S. 37(1), 132, 158BC, 260A]

PCIT v. Samudra Developers (P.) Ltd [2023] 155 taxmann.com 629 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure –Method of accounting-Project completion method-Sales support and management expenses; Project completion method-Day-to-day business expenditure like staff salaries are revenue in nature; cannot be disallowed proportionately based on percentage of project completion. [S. 145]

Bond Safety Belts (Dissolved) v. DCIT [2023] 156 taxmann.com 222 (Bom.)(HC) Editorial : Dy. CIT v. Times Guaranty Ltd. [IT Appeal Nos. 4947 and 4198(Mum) of 2008 dt. (2010) 40 SOT 14 (SB)(Mum)(Trib) is held to be not good law.

S. 32 : Depreciation-Unabsorbed depreciation –Short term capital gains-Set-off-Unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to pre-amendment years (prior to AY 2002-03) is eligible for indefinite carry forward and set-off against income under any head, including capital gains, in subsequent assessment years. [S. 32(2), 70, 71, 72]