Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


The Zoos & Parks Authority Of Telangana v. Dy.CIT (E) (2025) 236 TTJ 117/ 174 taxmann.com 1136 (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Change of name]-Not applied for fresh registration-Assessed under the normal provisions of the Act]-All permissible deductions, including expenditure incurred out of said income, allowable as deduction-Matter restored to the file of the Assessing Officer. [S. 12A, 37 (1)]

Institute Management Committee ITI Jhalawar v. ITO (2025) 236 TTJ 420 / 174 taxmann.com 1071 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Filing of return-total income of the assessee without giving effect to the provisions of s. 10(23C)(iiiad)] exceeded the maximum amount not chargeable to income-tax-Not required to file return of income either under section 139(1) or under section 139(4C)]-Return filed in response to section 148 cannot be treated as invalid]-Disallowance of claim was not justified. [S. 10(23C)(iiiad), 139(1) 139(4C), 148]

Ganpati Gems & Jewellers v. ACIT (2025) 236 TTJ 100 (Jaipur) Trib)

S. 10AA: Special Economic Zones-Non-submission of audit report along with return-Audit report was filed during assessment proceedings]-Exemption cannot be denied merely on account of delay in furnishing the audit report.[Form No 56F]

Trans World International LLC v. DCIT (IT) (2025) 236 TTJ 385 / 175 taxmann.com 703 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 9(1)(vi): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India]-Royalty-license fee for granting broadcasting right-Not royalty]-Apportionment of license fee-‘live coverage’ of the event has very large viewership as compared to a recorded broadcast and, therefore, it is appropriate to allocate 10 per cent of the license fee for broadcasting rights towards recorded events and 90 per cent towards ‘live coverage-DTAA-India]-USA.[S.90, Art. 12(3)]

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 236 TTJ 699 / 174 taxmann.com 238 (Hyd) Trib)

S. 4: Charge of income-tax -Accrual-Interest receivable from foreign subsidiaries-Financial year-Failed to reconcile- Addition is affirmed.[S. 5, 145]

ACIT v. Gopi Kishan Malani (2025) 236 TTJ 904 (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Loan received from third parties not related to the company in which the assessee had a substantial interest- Difficult to presume that there was an arrangement or colourable device in respect of the transactions-loans received by the assessee from Sunil Jain and Heera Lal Modi cannot be treated as deemed dividend.

Nirmal Jethalal Modi v. DCIT (2025) 235 TTJ 575 / 173 taxmann.com 400 (Mum)(Trib)

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition Act, 2015.

S. 10: Assessment-Undisclosed asset located outside India-Bank account outside India-Documents were given to the bank much before the enactment of Black Money Act-Inheritance-Income earned abroad-Addition was deleted. [S. 10(3)]

DCIT v. Vinod Ramchandra Jadhav (2025) 235 TTJ 342 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Addition on account of notional rental income-Rental income-Arithmetical error-There was a shortfall in disclosing rental income-Voluntary disclosure of income to cover any omission-No concealment penalty-Appeal admitted by High Court-No penalty-Penalty order barred by limitation. [S. 245(2C), 245 D(4), 275(1)(c)]

United Brothers Multiplast LLP v. PCIT (2025) 235 TTJ 798 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Lack of proper enquiry-Credit for tax deducted at source-No double grant of TDS credit-Revision order was set aside. [S. 142(1), 143(2),148]

Teena Garg (Smt) v. PCIT (2025) 235 TTJ 749/ 123 ITR 326 / 174 taxmann.com 872 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-
Lack of proper enquiry-Long-term capital gains-PCIT has failed to establish the erroneous character of the assessment order and that too in such a manner that it is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue-Revision order is quashed and set aside. [S. 45, 143(3)]