Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sanjay Patel v. ACIT(Bom) (HC) www.itatonline .org

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice -Income from other sources – Failure to respond to notice – Audit objection after amendment – Factual disputes can not be adjudicated in writ proceedings when an alternative remedy is available- Writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file an appeal. [S. 57, 142(1), 143(3), 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

ACIT v. Neelam Omprakash Singh (Mum)( Trib)www.itatonlline .org

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – Development agreement – Cost Inflation Index – Year of taxability – Tribunal’s common order applied to all co-owners – Miscellaneous application of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 45 , 48 , 254(1)]

Sejal Jewellery & others v. UOI .(Bom) (HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 148: Reassessment – Income of any other person – Search – Search material pertains to third party – Notice of reassessment under Section 148 is held without jurisdiction – Section 153C and not section 148 is to be resorted to- Notice of reassessment is quashed and set aside . [S. 132, 147, 151(1), 153A, 153C, Art. 226]

Munchener Ruckversicherungs Gesellshaft Aktiengesellschaft In Munchen v.CIT (IT) (2024) 341 CTR 941 / 8 NYPCTR 1232 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Credit for tax deducted at source-Double taxation agreement-Refund interest-Respondents are directed to refund the amount along with statutory interest forthwith. [S. 90, 155(14), 199, Form No 266AS, Art. 226]

Rajiv Mehra v. CIT (2024) 168 taxmann.com 273 /341 CTR 329 / 243 DTR 161 / 8 NYPCTR 1424 (P&H) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Additional evidence-No application was moved-Failure to produce will during assessment proceedings-Order of Tribunal is affirmed.[R.46A, 260A. Order 41, Rule, 27CPC]

PCIT v. Pankaj Buildwell Ltd. & Group (2024) 161 taxmann.com 605/ 341 CTR 127 / 8 NYPCTR 457 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Application-Conditions-Full and true disclosure-Revision of application-No full and true disclosure-Order of Settlement Commission is set aside.[S.245C, 245D (4),245H, Art. 226]

Chandrasekarapuram Co-Operative Whole Sale Stores Ltd. v. CCIT (2024) 161 taxmann.com 807 / 341 CTR 575 / 242 DTR 554 / 8 NYPCTR 541 (Mad)(HC)

S. 234A : Interest-Default in furnishing return of income-Marginal delay in filing of return-Interest u/s 234A is waived-Advance tax-Deferment of advance tax-Waiver or reduction-Board’s F. No. 400/129/2002-IT(B), dt. 26th June, 2006-CBDT Circular, does not specifically deal with waiver of interest under S.. 234B and 234C-Does not specifically deal with waiver of interest-No impediments operating against the assessee from paying the advance tax within the time line under S. 211. [S. 119, 211, 234B, 234C, Art. 226]

Diana Gomez v. CIT (A) (2024) 341 CTR 583 / 241 DTR 47 / 8 NYPCTR 429 (Ker) (HC) Editorial : Diana Gomez v. CIT (A) (2024) 341 CTR 581 /241 DTR 45 / 8 NYPCTR 428 (Ker)(HC), order is modified.

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Stay-Direction to pay 15 per cent of total demand.[S. 250, Art. 226]

Diana Gomez v. CIT (A) (2024) 341 CTR 581 /241 DTR 45 / 8 NYPCTR 428 (Ker)(HC) Editorial : Diana Gomez v CIT(A) (2024) 341 CTR 583 / 241 DTR 47 (Ker)(HC) is Modified.

S. 226 : Collection and recovery-Modes of recovery-Stay-Direction to pay 15 per cent of total demand-Condition imposed on the assessee by the Single Judge to remit 15 per cent of the total demand while granting stay of recovery proceedings is set aside; rest of the directions in the impugned judgment are not interfered with.[S. 250, Art. 226]

Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. DCIT (IT) (2024) 166 taxmann.com 660 / 341 CTR 6 /242 DTR 153 / 8 NYPCTR 1252 (Bom) (HC)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Interest-Tax deduction at source-Failure to deduct tax at source-Capital gains tax-Limitation-Alternative remedy-Writ petition is dismissed-DTAA-India-UK-Strictures-Observations made by the Assessing Officer is directed to be expunged within two days and directed the ASG to take appropriate measures. [S. 45, 158(2),195, 201(1), 201(IA), Art. 14, Art. 226]