Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ITO v. Jatin Kanubhai Kotadia (2023) 225 TTJ 663 /155 taxmann.com 617 (Ahd)(Trib) ITO v. Narendrabhai D. Kanani (2023) 225 TTJ 663 155 taxmann.com 617 (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 45(4) : Capital gains-Distribution of capital asset-Dissolution of firm-Firm-Partners-Revaluation of assets-Amounts credited to partners capital account-Conversion of firm in to company-Not chargeable to tax in the hands of the partners.[ S.2(47), 45, 47(xiii)(b)]

Mahendra Corporation v. Dy. CIT (2023) 224 TTJ 777 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Right to sue-Amount received as per consent decree in the suit for specific performance of agreement to sell-Arrangement amongst the parties-Not relinquishment of any right in favour of partners-Not assessable as capital gains.[ S. 4, 2(14)]

Bhausaheb Sopanrao Bhor v. ITO (2023) 225 TTJ 367 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Additional evidence-Transfer-Development agreement-Possession of land was not handed over-Encroachment in land-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer.[ S. 2(47), 254(1)]

Amritlal Batra v. Add. CIT(2023) 226 TTJ 917/ (2024) 110 ITR 127/ 160 taxmann.com 236 (Amritsar)(Trib)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Business income-Sale of shares-Shown as investment-Assessable as capital gains and not as business income.[ S. 28(i)]

Dy. CIT v. Rajnikant Prabhudas Mandavia (2023) 157 taxmann.com 316 / 226 TTJ 778 (Ahd)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Penny stock-Purchase and sale through banking channel-Addition as cash credit is deleted.[ S. 10(38)) 68,]

Tata AIG General Insurance Co.Ltd v. Dy. CIT(2023) 224 TTJ 724 /(2022)) 141 taxmann.com 70 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 44 : Insurance business-Depreciation-Allowable to insurance company. [ S. 30 to 43B]

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 154 taxmann.com 372 / 226 TTJ 361 (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Provision for various expenses-Not in apposition to identify the parties /creditors-Provisions which were made on estimate basis were reversed in month of April i.e. in subsequent financial year and that when payments were made based on actual invoices, tax was deducted at source as per provisions of Act-Disallowance is deleted. [ S. 145]

Tata AIG General Insurance Co.Ltd v. Dy. CIT(2023) 224 TTJ 724 /(2022)) 141 taxmann.com 70 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Payment of re-insurance premium foreign insurers-Foreign Insurance company has no business or branch in India-No violation of provisions of Insurance Act-No obligation to deduct tax at source. [ S.9(1)(i), 195]

Interactive Avenues (P) Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2023) 225 TTJ 403/ (2022) 143 taxmann.com 445 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Royalty-Advertisement agency-Website owner-Not royalty-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-Ireland.[ S. 9(1)(vi), 195, art.12]

N. R. Wires (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2023) 224 TTJ 480 (Raipur)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Company-No personal-Vehicle running expenses-Depreciation-Telephone and mobile expenses-Disallowance cannot be made on account of personal use-Employees contribution-Paid before due date of filing of return-Allowable as deduction. [ S. 32(1)(ii),36(1)(va), 139(1)]