Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Muthoot Fincorp Ltd. v. ITSC(2023)456 ITR 418/ 293 Taxman 623 (Ker)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Full and true disclosure of undisclosed income-Pending application-Rejection of application is not valid-Matter remanded to Interim Board. [S. 245A, 245B, 245C, Art. 226]

Indusind Bank Ltd. v ITSC (2023)456 ITR 376/152 taxmann.com 489 (Bom)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Surrendering claim for depreciation on leased assets-Report of Commissioner for addition of interest on Government Securities-Order of Settlement Commission non-speaking-Matter referred to Interim Board-Precedent-Supreme Court decision-Judicial decision acts retrospectively. [S. 245AA 245C, R.9, Art. 226]

J. K. Industries v Krishna Sahal v. CIT (2023)456 ITR 588 /153 taxmann.com 523 / 335 CTR 402(Bom)(HC)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Interest paid on penalty-Section 240 do not differentiate between refund of tax or penalty or any other amount-Deletion of penalty by Tribunal-Interest paid on penalty-Entitled to interest on Interest. [S. 220(2), 220(6), 240, 244(1A), 244A, 264271(1)(c), Art.226]

Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)456 ITR 743 /148 taxmann.com 410/ 333 CTR 454/ 224 DTR 389 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 241A : Refunds-Withholding of refund-Permission for withholding of refund given without application of mind is not valid.[S. 143(2), Art. 226]

Jaswinder Pal Singh (Col.) (Retd.) v.PCIT (2023)456 ITR 410/152 taxmann.com 103 / 334 CTR 319(P&H)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Disability pension-Retired Officer of Indian Army-Arrears of disability pension received in December 2008-Entitled to exemption-Strictures-Court directed the Revenue for refund of tax paid by assessee with interest at 9 per cent. per annum within one month with costs of Rs. 1 lakh. If the payment was not made within the stipulated period interest was to be paid at 18 per cent. per annum from the date of entitlement till actual payment. [Pension Regulations for the Army, Rule, 173]

Mahalakshmi Textile Mills Ltd. v.Dy. CIT (2023)456 ITR 25 /152 taxmann.com 227 (Mad)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay
Company in liquidation-Properties in execution proceedings-Granted permission to pay dues with interest in monthly instalments.[S. 143(1)(a), 156,220(6), Art. 226]

Amtek Transportation Systems Ltd. v ACIT (2023)456 ITR 4 / 156 taxmann.com 35 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of appeal Recovery Of Tax-Condition of deposit of 20 per.cent of outstanding demand is not mandatory. [S.220(6), Art. 226]

Air Liquide Medical Systems Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2023)456 ITR 712/ 155 taxmann.com 409 (Mad)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of appeal-Paid 15 Per Cent. of demand-Stay is granted till disposal of pending appeal. [S.220(6), 246A, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Plama Developers Ltd. (2023)456 ITR 45 /151 taxmann.com 147 (Karn)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Undisclosed income-Loose paper-Addition is not valid. [S. 132]

Rajesh Kumar Agarwal v. UOI (2023)456 ITR 1/154 taxmann.com 404 (Cal)(HC) Editorial: Decision of single judge is set aside, Rajesh Kumar Agarwal v. UOI (Cal)(HC) (WPA No. 6956 of 2023 dt 1-5-2023)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Principles of natural justice-Initial notice not stating transactions of assessee with two companies-Erroneously stating that the assessee did not respond to show-cause notice-Notice and order is set aside. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]