S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Educational institution-Fee reimbursement-90 per cent of students delayed the payment of fees-Reasonable cause-Criminal prosecution is quashed. [S. 192B, 194A 194C, 194J, 201(1)(a), 278AA, 279, Criminal Procedure Code, 1976, S. 482]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Capital gains-Deduction is rejected-Levy of penalty is justified-Undisclosed income-Gift received from non-Resident-Penalty is justified. [S.54B, 54F, 69, 158BC]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Capital gains-Additional income is accepted in the revised return-Penalty notice not specifying the charge-Order of Tribunal deleting the penalty is affirmed.[S. 143(1), 148]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Not specifying the charge-Order of tribunal deleting the penalty is affirmed. [S. 260A]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Not specifying the charge-Order of Tribunal deleting the penalty is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [Art. 136]

S. 264: Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Principle of natural justice-Order passed without giving an assessee adequate opportunity to be heard is set aside.[S. 5, Art. 226]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Sale of immovable property-Allowing deduction on amount paid directly by purchaser to release charge of mortgage in property sold under attachment due to personal guarantee given by assessee-Discharge of debt-Order of the Assessing Officer to allow the claim is nether erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. [S. 143(3), 260A]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Remittances to non-resident-Import of raw materials-Deduction of tax at source-Tribunal setting aside the order of Commissioner-Commissioner cannot make addition without directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine issue. [S. 40(a)(ia), 195, 254, 260A]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Remittances to non-resident-Import of raw materials-Deduction of tax at source-Tribunal setting aside the order of Commissioner-Commissioner cannot make addition without directing the Assessing Officer to re-examine issue-Order of High Court is affirmed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 40(a)(ia), 195, 254, Art. 136.]

S.260A : Appeal-High Court-Reassessment-Matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer-Over due interest-Non forming asset-Question of fact.[S. 36(1)(viia) 43D, 147, 148]