Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Thapar Homes (P) Ltd. (2025) 347 CTR 184 / 256 DTR 144 (Delhi)

S. 271E : Penalty-Repayment of loan or deposit-Limitation-Reference made on 7th June, 2011-The order was barred by limitation which expired on 30th June, 2011-Penalty order dt. 30th Dec., 2011, was barred by limitation. [S. 275(1)(c)]

Chhattisgarh Steel Castings (P) Ltd. v PCIT (2025) 347 CTR 857 / 255 DTR 408 / 306 Taxman 28 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Editorial :Chhattisgarh Steel Castings (P) Ltd. v CIT (2025) 304 Taxman 447 / 347 CTR 861 / 255 DTR 412 (Chhattisgarh) 412 affirmed.

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Not submitted any satisfactory explanation regarding the discrepancy at the time of assessment proceedings or at the time of penalty proceedings-Contention that only GP should be added to income was not accepted-Order of single judge rejecting the petition under section 264 against concealment penalty was affirmed.[S. 271(1)(c), Art. 226]

CIT v. Pancard Clubs Ltd. (2025) 180 taxmann.com 529/ 347 CTR 672 / 256 DTR 180 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Pancard Clubs Ltd(2014) 226 Taxman 141/ 272 CTR 257 /(2015) 370 ITR 45 (Bom)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Accrual of income-Holiday scheme-Refund not only advance but also surrendered value in case of non-utilization of scheme-Incurred liability and no income accrued to assessee on receipt of advance-No claim was made by the Department in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process proceedings-Order of High Court affirming the order of Tribunal is affirmed-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 4, 5, Art. 136]

Greaves Electric Mobility Ltd. v ACIT (2025) 176 taxmann.com 275 /347 CTR 785 / 254 DTR 497 (Mad)(HC)

S. 245 : Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-
Discharged 20 per cent of the tax demand-Entitle to stay-Pendency of rectification application-Respondent is directed to dispose of the refund application filed by the assessee and grant refund of Rs. 3,000,0000 along with interest. [S. 154,246A, 250, Art. 226]

Shree Cement Ltd v. Dy. CIT(IT) (2025) 347 CTR 526 / 254 DTR 297 (Raj)(HC)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-DTAA-India-Mauritius—Interest income-Specific approval of Government— Foreign lender’s eligibility under DTAA having been established through supporting documentation, no further separate approval under S. 195(2) or S. 197 was required. Revenue directed to refund 5 per cent TDS amount deposited by assessee along with applicable interest under S. 244A.[S.90(2), 194LC(2)(ia),195(2) 197,Art. 11(2)]

DCIT v. Biesse India (P) Ltd. (2025) 178 taxmann.com 282 / 347 CTR 277 / 254 DTR 397 (Karn)(HC)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Limitation— for assessment year 2012-13, assessment order was passed on 31.01.2017 for the AY. 2012-13-Order giving effect to ITAT order was passed beyond prescribed three months under section 153(5) on 23.08.2023-Order was time-barred-Single judge is justified in direction for refund with interest under section 244A(1)(b) and 244A(1A). [S.153(5),153(9), Art. 226]

CIT v. Nish Developers (P) Ltd (2025) 177 taxmann.com 472 / 347 CTR 412 (Bom)(HC)

S. 194H : Deduction at source-Commission or brokerage-Agreement with ADPL to develop a plot of land-Association of person (AOP)-Payment was principal to principal basis-Not commission or brokerage-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.133A, 201(1) 201(IA), 260A]

CIT v. Krishna Kumar Daga (2025) 347 CTR 729 / 255 DTR 465 (Cal)(HC)

S. 158BD : Block assessment-Undisclosed income of any other person-No recording of satisfaction-Office note cannot be considered as recording of satisfaction-Order of Tribunal quashing the assessment order is affirmed by High Court.[S.132, 158BC, 260A]

Manohar Lal Poddar v. UOI (2025) 176 taxmann.com 344/ 347 CTR 389 / 254 DTR 172 (Pat)(HC)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Designated authority-Certificate in Form 5 was issued–Scope of section 154 was limited to amend any order passed by Assessing Officer under provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961 and it would not be extended to sit over order passed and declaration issued by designated authority under section 5 of DTVSV Act-Order passed by Assessing Officer under section 154 was set aside [S.132(IA), Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 Form No 5, Art. 226]

Vijay Bihari Kandhari v. ACIT (2025) 347 CTR 681 / 256 DTR 185 /(2026) 308 Taxman 400 (Bom)(HC)

S. 153B : Assessment-Search-Time limit-Proceedings initiated under section 153C-No question of transfer of records seized-Time limit provided by first limb of clause (ii) of third proviso to section 153B(1) shall apply-12 months from end of financial year in which search took place-Time barred-Order quashed.[S. 132, 153C, Art. 226]