Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Bank of Maharashtra Officers’ Organisation v. UOI [2023] 153 taxmann.com 190 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 17(2) : Salary-Perquisite-Constitutional validity-Amendment by Finance Act, 2007-Challenge to amendment-Outcome of writ petition to be governed by adjudication in similar petitions pending at Principal Seat.[S. 15, Art. 226]

PCIT (E) v. National Health & Education Society [2023] 154 taxmann.com 636 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Business incidental to main objects-Surplus from a pharmacy operated by a hospital trust for its patients is ancillary to the main charitable object of medical relief and not taxable as business income.[S.2(13),10(23C)(via),11(4A),260A]

Balkrishna v. State of Maharashtra [2023] 151 taxmann.com 62 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Interest on compensation-Motor accident claims-Deduction at source-Interest other than interest on securities-Interest awarded from date of claim petition until judgment of Court is not ‘income’ and, thus, not exigible to tax; no TDS deductible. [S. 2(28A), 194A]

Dhanraj Malchand Rathi v. UOI [2022] 137 taxmann.com 448 (Bom.)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020

S. 4: Filing of declaration-Pending revision-A revision application under section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, filed with a request for condonation of delay, is considered ‘pending’ for the purposes of the DTVSV Act until it is disposed of by the CIT-An AO cannot reject the declaration on the basis that the revision is time-barred-The Assessing Officer was directed to process declaration of assessee and pass such order as required in accordance with law. [S. 2, Income-tax Act, 1961, S. 264, Art. 226]

Anil Dhirajlal Ambani v. UOI [2022] 145 taxmann.com 656 (Bom.) (HC)

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015

S. 50 : Punishment for failure to furnish information about foreign asset-Stay of proceedings-Prosecution is premature when based on an assessment order against which an appeal is pending before the CIT(A)-High Court directed the revenue not to proceed further on the basis of the show-cause notice until the next date of hearing, thereby granting an interim stay [S.51 Income-tax Act, 1961, 276C]

CIT v. Sanvijay Rolling & Engg. Ltd. [2022] 137 taxmann.com 123 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Merger of orders-Revisional jurisdiction cannot be exercised on an issue which has been considered and decided by the Tribunal on appeal. [S. 80IA, 80IB, 271(1)(c)]

Neo Sannyas Foundation v. ITO (E) [2022] 140 taxmann.com 481 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice based on a closed tax evasion petition and non-actionable information is invalid.[S. 147, Art. 226]

Sodexo India Services (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [2022] 141 taxmann.com 311 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Audit objection-Assessing Officer to form independent belief; reopening cannot be based merely on dictates of revenue audit. [S. 92CA, 148, Art. 226]

Samet Estates (P.) Ltd v. CIT (2022) 140 taxmann.com 342 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Change of opinion –Capital gains Reopening to treat capital gains as business income invalid where issue was considered in original assessment-Reopening also invalid where same issue was dropped in revision proceedings. [S. 28(i), 45, 148, 263]

Sherwin Williams Paints India (P.) Ltd v. DCIT (2022) 140 taxmann.com 7 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Change of opinion –Non-compete fee-Where an issue was specifically examined during original assessment through a query, reopening on the same issue constitutes an invalid change of opinion, even if the assessment order is silent on that point. [S. 37(1), 148, Art. 226]