Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


AVTEC Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 692 / (2025) 129 ITR 483 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vii): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Non-resident-Warehousing charges paid outside India-Not Fees for Technical Services-No liability to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-USA [S. 195, Art. 12]

Laserwords US Inc. v. Dy. CIT [2024] 162 taxmann.com 543 / (2025) 129 ITR 39 (Trib.) Editorial : Affirmed in CIT v. Laserwords US Inc. (2025) 302 Taxman 216 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Non-resident-Marketing services-Sales commission-Not Fees for Included Services under India-USA DTAA-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-USA-Delay of 89 days was condoned. [S. 254(1) Art. 12(4)(b)]

Edenred SE (formerly known as Edenred SA) v. Dy. CIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 161 / (2025) 129 ITR 603 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Non-resident-Technology and strategic information system services rendered outside India-No right to use software or intellectual property granted-Receipts not taxable as royalty-Management service fees-General management services rendered to group companies-Neither royalty nor Fees for Technical Services-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-France. [S. 9(1)(vii), Art. 12]

Pr. CIT (Central)-4 v. DBM Geotechnics and Construction Pvt. Ltd. (Bom.)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 260A: Appeal – High Court – Assessment – Once a Resolution Plan is approved under section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, all statutory dues, including income-tax claims, which do not form part of the approved Resolution Plan stand extinguished. Consequently, any appeal by the Revenue seeking to revive such tax demand becomes academic, and no substantial question of law arises. [S. 143(3), Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S. 31 ]

Rajesh Somandas Sachdev v. ITO & Ors. (Bom.)(HC)

S. 276CC: Offences and prosecutions – Failure to furnish return of income – Prosecution for failure to furnish the return of income is not maintainable where, on regular assessment, the tax payable after giving credit for TDS and advance tax does not exceed the statutory limit.- Where the assessee is entitled to a refund, and there is no loss of revenue, continuation of criminal prosecution amounts to an abuse of the process of law. [S. 139(1), 142(1), 147, 148, Art. 226 ]

Bhagwana Ram Bishnoi v. DCIT (Mum) ( Trib) www.itatonline.org .

S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure -Bogus purchases -Where the sales, quantitative stock records and consumption of goods are accepted, and the purchases are supported by invoices, delivery challans, bank payments and stock records, merely because the supplier is found to be non-genuine, the entire purchases cannot be disallowed- Only the profit element embedded in such purchases is liable to be taxed. In the case of a trader in ferrous and non-ferrous metals, estimation of profit at 2% of the disputed purchases is reasonable, and application of 12.5% is unjustified. [S. 145 ]

MD Sons& Ors v. ITO (SB )(Bang ) Trib)www.itatonline.org

S. 143(2): Assessment – Notice – Notice of demand to be valid in certain circumstances -Limited scrutiny – Authentication of notices and other documents – A notice issued under section 143(2) after 23-06-2017 is not rendered invalid merely because it is not in the format prescribed by the CBDT Instruction dated 23-06-2017 or does not specify whether the case is selected for Limited Scrutiny, Complete Scrutiny or Manual Scrutiny- Such omission is a procedural defect cured by section 292BB provided the notice is issued within limitation, conveys that the return has been selected for scrutiny and no prejudice is caused to the assessee. [S. 119, 142(1), 143(3), 282A, 292B, 292BB]

Rajesh Shamji Furia v. ITO ( Mum)( Trib) www itatonline.org

S. 45: Capital gains – Redevelopment -On redevelopment of a building, the redeveloped flat received in lieu of the original flat is a continuation of the existing capital asset and not a new independent capital asset- The period of holding is to be reckoned from the date on which rights in the original property/redevelopment crystallised and not from the date of the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement- Consequently, gain on sale of the redeveloped flat is assessable as long-term capital gain and eligible for indexation and exemption under sections 54/54F. [S. 2(42A, 48, 54F, CBDT Circular Nos. 471 & 672 ]

Hero Products India Pvt. Ltd. v. NFAC (Bom.)(HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment –Best judgment assessment -Reassessment – Assessment order passed without granting the assessee a fair and effective opportunity of hearing is liable to be quashed- Where statutory notices are not effectively communicated to the assessee’s registered e-mail addresses, the assessment is vitiated for breach of principles of natural justice. [S. 143(2), 144, 148, 156, 282,ITAT R.127, Art . 226 ]

Merchant Association v. ITO ( Pune )( Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 167B: Charge of tax – Shares of members unknown – Maximum Marginal Rate is not applicable to a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860- Such a society is liable to tax at the normal rates and not at the Maximum Marginal Rate, even if the shares of its members are indeterminate. [S. 143(1), 154, 250]