Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Arun Tulshidas Kharat v. DCIT ( 2024) 204 ITD 618 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 48 : Capital gains –Mode of Computation -Cost of improvement- Failure to prove the expenditure incurred – Disallowance of expenditure is affirmed .[S. 45 ]

Amrut Antimdham Charitable Trust v. CIT ( E ) ( 2024) 204 ITD 625 ( Ahd ) (Trib)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration -Genuineness of activities – Failure to file documentary evidences to verify the activities in consonance with its objects – Rejection of application is held to be justified .[ S. 12A(1), R. 17A(2), Form No .10AB ]

ITO v. Footcandles Film (P.) Ltd. (2023) 295 Taxman 410/(2024) 460 ITR 671 (SC) Editorial : ITO v. Footcandles Film (P.) Ltd. (2023) 453 ITR 402 /146 taxmann.com 304 / 333 CTR 612(Bom)(HC)

S. 279 : Offences and prosecutions-Sanction-Chief Commissioner-Tax deduction at source-Compounding application-Application was filed beyond twelve months-Rejection of application was set aside by High Court-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 200, 276B, 278B, 279(2), Art. 136]

D. M. Kathir Anand v. N.S. Phanidharan (2023) 154 taxmann.com 52 (Mad)(HC) Editorial : Notice is issued in SLP filed by the assessee, D.M. Kathir Anand v. N.S. Phanidharan (2023) 295 Taxman 234 (SC)

S. 276CC : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to furnish return of income-Failure to pay self assessment tax-Criminal complaint is filed before the Magistrate Court-Petition filed before the High Court to quash the proceedings is dismissed. [S. 139(1), 139(4), 140A,,276C, 278E,Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 482]

D.M. Kathir Anand v. N.S. Phanidharan (2023) 295 Taxman 234 (SC) Editorial: D.M. Kathir Anand v. N.S. Phanidharan (2023) (2023) 154 taxmann.com 52 (Mad)(HC)

S. 276CC : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to furnish return of income-Failure to pay self assessment tax-Criminal complaint is filed before the Magistrate Court-Petition filed before the High Court to quash the proceedings is dismissed-Notice is issued in SLP filed by the assessee. [S. 139(1), 139(4), 140A,,276C, 278E,Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 482]

CIT (Central) v. C. Swapna (2023) 295 Taxman 4/ 335 CTR 1015 (SC) Editorial : Refer, CIT v. C.Swapna (AP)(HC), (ITA No. 123 of 2015 dt. 6-8-2015)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Transfer of money through journal entries-No penalty is leviable-Appeal of Revenue dismissed as infructuous. [S. 269SS, Art. 136]

CIT v. Sahara India Financial Corp. Ltd. (2023) 456 ITR 788 / 295 Taxman 2 (SC) Editorial: Order of Delhi High Court is affirmed, CIT v. Sahara India Financial Corp. Ltd (2012) 26 taxmann.com 269 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Acceptance of loans and deposits-Otherwise than by account payee cheque or account payee bank draft-Reasonable cause-Order of High Court deleting the penalty is affirmed. [S. 269SS, 273B]

PCIT v. Nalini Surrendrabhai Patel (2023) 458 ITR 540 / 295 Taxman 187 / 335 CTR 1088(Guj.)(HC)

S. 268A : Appeal-Instructions-Monetary limits-Applicable to revision order passed under section 263 of the Act-Appeal dismissed due to low tax effect. [S. 263, 260A]

Diwaker Tripathi v. PCIT (2023) 295 Taxman 532 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Mistakenly filed details of the Assessement year 2014-15 instead of Assessment year 2013-14-Rejection of revision application is not justified-Matter remanded to the Commissioner for de novo con sideration. [S. 143(1), 154, Art. 226]

Amresh Kumar v. PCIT (2023)459 ITR 356 /154 taxmann.com 221 (Jharkhand)(HC) Editorial: SLP dismissed, Amresh Kumar v. PCIT (2023)459 ITR 364 / 295 Taxman 1 (SC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Undisclosed income — Not maintaining the books of account-Contract works and other sources-Tax deduction at source-Form No 26AS showing the additional income-Payee confirming the payments-8% gross profit is estimated including the undisclosed income-Rejection of revision order is affirmed by High Court. [S. 133(6), 143(3), Form No. 26AS, Art. 226]