Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Adarsh Rice Mill v. ITO (2023) 222 TTJ 390 / 227 DTR 7 (SMC) (Raipur) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice is issued by the Assessing Officer who had no jurisdiction-Reassessment is bad in law-Additional grounds-Question of law is admitted. [S. 2(7A), 120, 124(3), 143(3), 148]

Sudesh Rani (Smt) v. ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 759 (Chd)(Trib) Ritu Garg (Smt) v. ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 759 (Chd)(Trib) Urmila Rani (Smt) v. ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 759 (Chd)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Alleged bogus long term capital gains-Sale of shares-Information from Investigation Wing-Non application of mind-Reassessment is quashed. [S. 10(38), 45]

ITO v. Vibgyor Texotech (P) Ltd (2023) 221 TTJ 708 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account-Estimation of profit-Rejection of books of account is justified-Estimate of @ 5 percent of the turnover is affirmed-Jurisdiction issue is not challenged in the course of assessment proceedings hence not entertained-Reassessment is affirmed. [S. 124(3),145(3), 147, 148]

FRD Solutions FZC v. Dy. CIT (2023) 222 TTJ 628 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-DRP cannot set aside any proposed variation or issue any direction for further enquiry-Direction issued to the Assessing Officer to pass a speaking order in respect of Permanent Entablement is contrary to the provisions of section 144C(8) [S. 9(1)(i), 144C(8)]

Sudir Kumar Agarwal v. ITO (2023) 221 TTJ 687 (Raipur)(Trib)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Jurisdiction-Assessment order passed by non-Jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Contrary to CBDT instruction No. 1 of 2011 dt. 1-4-2011-Order is bad in law. [S. 119,124(3), 143(2)]

Goyal Construction v. ITO (2023) 223 TTJ 21 (UO)(SMC)(Raipur)(Trib)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice under section 143(2) was issued by non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify as to territorial jurisdiction at the time of issue of notice. [S. 143(2)]

Durgapur Passengers Carriers Association v. ITO (2023) 223 TTJ 1010 / 150 taxmann.com 171 (SMC)(Kol)(Trib)

S. 143(1) : Assessment-Intimation-Invalid return-CPC has no jurisdiction to process the return and disallow the claim. [S. 139(9)]

Dolli Chandrashekhar Shankar (HUF) v. ACIT (2023) 222 TTJ 1 (Pune)(Trib)

S. 139 : Return of income-Capital loss-Short term capital loss-Carry forward-Entitle to the benefit of extended due date of filing upto 31st October 2019 [S. 74, 80IA(7), 139(1), Expl. 2(a)(ii)]

Legatum Ventures Ltd v. ACIT(IT)(2023) 223 TTJ 589 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 112 : Tax on long term capital gains-Determination of tax in certain cases-Non-resident-Sale of unlisted shares-Capital gains had to be computed only by reference to provisions of section 112(1)(c)(iii), without giving effect to first and second provisos to section 48. [S. 45, 48, 112(1)(c)(iii)]

Ambuja Cement Ltd v Addl. CIT (2023) 223 TTJ 427 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparable-Sale of low volume of exports cannot be considered as valid comparable-Adjustment made adopting the ALP of interest at six moths average of LIBOR plus 3. 5 % % is not sustainable.